Absolutely despicable. Seriously, how one acts is not dependent on race. The fact she was being bullied for just being the way she is is sad...

That was pretty hot! At least until some asshole ruined it by trying to be a super hero.

In all seriousness, it never ceases to appall me how many people can just stand by and watch someone get brutalized. Or worse, whip out their phones to film it as if the whole thing was staged for their amusement.

Times have changed, and sometimes for worst... well I "suffered" from bullying from 5th grade (11y) to senior (17y), but I didn't paid to much attention and the fights I had were not from bully or reaction but from some shitheads that wanted direct fight... but at least it was always one on one... It is too coward to not only abuse mentally but group beating a person that even one on one would have little chance.

And I always "love" to hear bulliers calling bullied cowards (but forgetting they are 10 agaisnt one).

Wow! That made my day......erm... I mean night!

When I was middle school, the black kids that cared about their education were usually treated like shit by other black kids. I always thought it was pretty sad that working hard to be educated and successful was treated negatively and stereotyped as white person pursuit.

The worst part was that the people staring all the time, deided to intervinne on the guy who was actually helping. He might have gone a little carryed away and seemed to be beaten them quite hard. But I belive they still deserved it. But why didnt they got up before? As far as we know that was his litle sister or girlfriend and he had every right to break their jaws.

Buy this:

http://www.hotsauceworld.com/bl3amrepeex.html

Mix a teaspoon or less, with 3.25oz of water and put in this:

http://www.amazon.com/Orka-Flavor-Mister-Black-3-25oz/dp/B005DSEWV2/ref=sr_1_7?s=kitchen&ie=UTF8&qid=1410202408&sr=1-7

The bullies will be too busy screaming in pain to act on any of their stupid urges.

I don't doubt US slaveholders used similar practices, though in their case the divide was usually "house slaves" and "field slaves" (as well as one of the debated origins of the word "cracker", as well, as our own Badgenome pointed out, being a derogatory term for the Scotch-Irish like the word hillbilly), though to what degree that leads to the modern prejudice, i cannot say.

It's pretty complex. To the extent that it happened, it was because lighter skinned slaves were usually the mistresses and children of the owner, so their better position was more a function of nepotism than colorism. Having lighter skin could actually be more of a liability than a boon since it had the potential to incite all kinds of uncomfortable feelings about miscegenation. The reason why the stereotypical large, dark-skinned mammy type was favored for cooking and taking care of kids is because she wasn't viewed as a sexual threat by the woman of the house, while light skinned slaves who were living proof of a husband's infidelity could just as likely expect to get it doubly bad and be sent to the fields to learn their place as to get any kind of preferential treatment.

But, of course, since it's widely believed to be the case, it contributes to modern day colorism regardless.

That's the deepest analysis of race I've ever seen.