Soundwave said:
There isn't going to be a $400 super duper Nintendo console. Not in 2017, not in 2018, not in 2019, not in 2020 IMO. Wii U in a lot of ways I think will be their last traditional console, they will simply just make a handheld next gen which also has a TV-centric (VitaTV) variant that allows the same games to be played on your television. To be honest I think the gaming landscape is going to change radically after this gen anyway. Go see the Sony thread where Sony themselves is openly talking about streaming replacing consoles eventually. I think even for Sony, Playstation 5 will be their last traditional console. I'm not sure if MS will try again either if XBox One is considered a dissapointment. Nintendo is out after the Wii U IMO. Also with the "next-gen" Nintendo platform being more like a portable first, I don't think any of this will be a big issue for Nintendo. They can position it more as the 3DS successor at first, even if it is effectively replacing both the 3DS and Wii U in the long run. Yet another plus for going the "Fusion" route. |
I guess it's possible, maybe even the best idea, but I don't see Nintendo doing that. The problem with Wii U was the marketing, confusing name, and the fact that everyone is out to destroy it. After playing Mario Kart 8, if graphics get better than that, count me good for graphics anywhere next gen. As far as power goes, I haven't seen any reason this really makes a difference other than pushing away third parties. And I think Nintendo learned that if it's this far underpowered( not much imo ) people are going to hate.
Edit-the point being, it's not a disgrace, it's fine.