CommonNinja said: I agree with poly here actually... Marketing cost a lot, and MS will be taking care of that, as well as playing them a royalty fee for holding it back... If the game reviews well, when they finaly make a PS4/PS3 edition, it will sell well, and will probabaly come with some added content to add incentive for people to buy. Also, by making this deal, they effectivly can release it after UC4 comes out, and that will help sales as well as they are basically the same type of game, and UC4 would seriously hurt it's PS4 sales. |
Games never sell as well after the hype wears off. It doesn't matter if a game reviews well, people will still lose interest a bit after release because the hype is dead.
There's still a good chance the PS4 version still outsells the XB1 version because of the size and range of the PS4 audience. Twice as many people and a large group of them probably already planned to buy the system for games in this type of genre, while the XB1 is pretty much a shooter machine.
Microsoft wins no matter what happens unless the game comletely dies out the gate, and because people in general mindlessly purchase based on hype, that won't happen. Second entries into AAA type franchises have a decent track record of outselling the first. MGS, RE, Uncharted, Halo, Gears, Tomb Raider, CoD, etc. are all good examples. So realistically, if Tomb Raider was already as good as the original, it was likely going to sell more than the first going by history. So it may sell more than the first but less than if it hadn't had exclusivity.
If it sells better than the first, which it would likely have done without MS, then MS will say they improved its sales. If it flops, people on PS4 aren't going to rush out in droves to buy it, and MS will spin it as the first title XB1 sold more than PS4 with and try to use it as proof that exclusivity on XB1 is a valid route to go.