By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Assassin's Creed Unity May Run At 720p On The PS4

 

Do you care if turns out to be true?

Yes 100 36.10%
 
No 123 44.40%
 
Hell yeah ammo for xbox nation!!! 54 19.49%
 
Total:277
BenVTrigger said:
I will literally not buy this game if thats true.


Really? Is 720p really that offensive to your eyes?

If they need to go 720p in order to make the game look its best than that is what they should do. Honestly I'd actually have a lot more respect for them if they make that trade off. It is pretty obvious at this point that neither the PS4 or the Xbox One are really capable of handling 1080p without major compromises. I'm not happy that next gen is this weak but if 720p is the optimal resolution then that is what developers should aim for. None of the "1080p" games I've played on the PS4 have impressed me. Most look the same if not sometimes worse than previous gen.



Around the Network
HailPrometheus said:
VanceIX said:
HailPrometheus said:

Ah that's what I thought evade the question, how do you know what "MOSt"people can and cannot see? Most people are not legally blind.

Not even going to bite. You can't speak for most people either, since most people don't spend their time living a pathetic existence of dozens of alts.


How can you type aren't you legally blind? lol. Only a baffoon argue barely anyone cannot see double the resolution. You are the retard saying upscaling improves the image when it doesn't, you don't ebven know what upscaling means.

Go the fuck away, Weazel! Seriously! >_>



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

I'm fine with that if they're going for higher framerate or better effects elsewhere which is the only explanation since 4 ran at 1080p and that wasn't even optimized for next gen systems.




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

720p/60fps > 1080p/30fps. The resolution is just a mask, its a cheap/commercially way to hide the real performance of the hardware so why bother...



VanceIX said:

I'm not even going to debate this anymore, I've burned myself out.

Look, if you need your games to be 1080p/60fps and believe it is a god given gift to you, than please, only enjoy those games.

I just want good games. If they look great, even better. If they look great and are 900p, not 1080p, I'm not going to blow a fuse over it. To each his own though, if you enjoy games based on their technicalities, I won't judge you for it.

Couldn´t agree more.



Around the Network
VanceIX said:
..

I'm not even going to debate this anymore, I've burned myself out.

Look, if you need your games to be 1080p/60fps and believe it is a god given gift to you, than please, only enjoy those games.

I just want good games. If they look great, even better. If they look great and are 900p, not 1080p, I'm not going to blow a fuse over it. To each his own though, if you enjoy games based on their technicalities, I won't judge you for it.

at this and everything above it...

 

...what is your expecation for a reasonable tv size and viewing distance.  i know for my set up (46" at 6 feet) the viewing charts puts me right on the line of 4k being a noticable difference to 1080p.   your cray cray if you think that i can't see a glaring difference between 720 and 1080 content.  the difference is massively notificable on my setup.   ..and honestly,.. between jaggies and other visual things i'd much rather have the jaggies gone.  those are soo distracting to an otherwise pretty visual graphics.

i delt with it last gen because there wasn't really any other choice.  but the thing about graphics is the standards are always changing and my standards pretty much now mandate 1080p. 



kitler53 said:
VanceIX said:
..

I'm not even going to debate this anymore, I've burned myself out.

Look, if you need your games to be 1080p/60fps and believe it is a god given gift to you, than please, only enjoy those games.

I just want good games. If they look great, even better. If they look great and are 900p, not 1080p, I'm not going to blow a fuse over it. To each his own though, if you enjoy games based on their technicalities, I won't judge you for it.

at this and everything above it...

 

...what is your expecation for a reasonable tv size and viewing distance.  i know for my set up (46" at 6 feet) the viewing charts puts me right on the line of 4k being a noticable difference to 1080p.   your cray cray if you think that i can't see a glaring difference between 720 and 1080 content.  the difference is massively notificable on my setup.   ..and honestly,.. between jaggies and other visual things i'd much rather have the jaggies gone.  those are soo distracting to an otherwise pretty visual graphics.

i delt with it last gen because there wasn't really any other choice.  but the thing about graphics is the standards are always changing and my standards pretty much now mandate 1080p. 


If your standards demand 1080p, you'd best just buy a PC. There's no way that every game this gen is going to be 1080p. The consoles aren't nearly that powerful.

Anyway, I can't see the difference between 1080p and up converted 900p on my 52in TV sitting 12 feet away. Once again, if you feel that 1080p is mandated for this generation, so be it.



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC

VanceIX said:
kitler53 said:
VanceIX said:
..

I'm not even going to debate this anymore, I've burned myself out.

Look, if you need your games to be 1080p/60fps and believe it is a god given gift to you, than please, only enjoy those games.

I just want good games. If they look great, even better. If they look great and are 900p, not 1080p, I'm not going to blow a fuse over it. To each his own though, if you enjoy games based on their technicalities, I won't judge you for it.

at this and everything above it...

 

...what is your expecation for a reasonable tv size and viewing distance.  i know for my set up (46" at 6 feet) the viewing charts puts me right on the line of 4k being a noticable difference to 1080p.   your cray cray if you think that i can't see a glaring difference between 720 and 1080 content.  the difference is massively notificable on my setup.   ..and honestly,.. between jaggies and other visual things i'd much rather have the jaggies gone.  those are soo distracting to an otherwise pretty visual graphics.

i delt with it last gen because there wasn't really any other choice.  but the thing about graphics is the standards are always changing and my standards pretty much now mandate 1080p. 


If your standards demand 1080p, you'd best just buy a PC. There's no way that every game this gen is going to be 1080p. The consoles aren't nearly that powerful.

Anyway, I can't see the difference between 1080p and up converted 900p on my 52in TV sitting 12 feet away. Once again, if you feel that 1080p is mandated for this generation, so be it.

well then that explains it then.  at 12 feet you'd need a ~60in TV for 1080 to be worth it. 

..but i don't think 12' is not a very typcial setup.  you must have quite the large living room to be sitting that far back.



kitler53 said:
VanceIX said:
kitler53 said:

at this and everything above it...

 

...what is your expecation for a reasonable tv size and viewing distance.  i know for my set up (46" at 6 feet) the viewing charts puts me right on the line of 4k being a noticable difference to 1080p.   your cray cray if you think that i can't see a glaring difference between 720 and 1080 content.  the difference is massively notificable on my setup.   ..and honestly,.. between jaggies and other visual things i'd much rather have the jaggies gone.  those are soo distracting to an otherwise pretty visual graphics.

i delt with it last gen because there wasn't really any other choice.  but the thing about graphics is the standards are always changing and my standards pretty much now mandate 1080p. 


If your standards demand 1080p, you'd best just buy a PC. There's no way that every game this gen is going to be 1080p. The consoles aren't nearly that powerful.

Anyway, I can't see the difference between 1080p and up converted 900p on my 52in TV sitting 12 feet away. Once again, if you feel that 1080p is mandated for this generation, so be it.

well then that explains it then.  at 12 feet you'd need a ~60in TV for 1080 to be worth it. 

..but i don't think 12' is not a very typcial setup.  you must have quite the large living room to be sitting that far back.

I also have a 46" that I sit 8 ft away from and a 26" that I use in my dorm room 4 ft away from. Don't notice much of a difference with those either.

Of course, some people in this thread have questioned my eyesight, so feel free to not take my word for it.



                                                                                                               You're Gonna Carry That Weight.

Xbox One - PS4 - Wii U - PC

It matters alot to me. I play on a 70 inch tv and the difference is noticeable. On the other hand I tend not to care about 60 fps as much as other (obviously preferred, but Res is a much bigger deal to me)



End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)

Wii- 72 million   3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases

360- 37 million   Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak

PS3- 29 million  Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut