58 hours until Night 1 - http://itsalmo.st/#night1

Wait what? What have I done? 

I don't want to rush into anything too soon until towards the end because it's the first day of my first game. That's just a natural response to me and I'm trying to learn the game and answer the questions posed towards me as best I can. I've read every post in the thread and have been analysing posts; and tomorrow I'll start discussing things with people in more depth (I'm not here from Sunday to Tuesday).

However, until then I'd like to see the reasoning for this accusation; moreso than a "foreign" playstyle. It's just the way I decided to try and play the game in order to understand what is going on without rushing to conclusions. I apologize if this doesn't make a lot of sense to you, but clinical precision is how I'd like to play the game, at least on this the first day when we know nothing and nothing is in play

Oh, I have made my decision already. It's all about the timing.

Yeah, probably but ah well. You learn from mistakes more so than successes, after all. 

Appreciate the advise as well. Let's see how we go!

More stats:
Average rate of improvement in post quality since I showed up and started "accusing everyone": 39.67%
Improvement rates:

Standard deviation: 25.9%
Average 39.67

First stdev= 13 to 65
Ike
Wright
White
Cone
Hylian
Nickels
Smeags
Sparks
Khan

2nd dev
Spurge
Noname
Outlaw

This proves scientifically, that the improvements in content quality are attributable in part at least, to myself.
Except I will remove wright and cone since I've had little interaction from them, their contributions were due to attacking each other.

Ike
White
Hylian
Nickels
Smeags
Sparks
Khan

All of these players I have had direct encounters with and the numbers scientifically prove with a 5% degree of uncertainty, that I have had an impact on their improvement of quality posts. Direct Correlation.

I attribute the cone and wright improvements to their own infighting as well as finally getting into the spirit of the game.

The 2nd standard deviation are people who were generally not impacted by myself. Basically, they would have posted well with or without me around. I can definitely agree on both spurge and noname. Both are really trying to play. The only other one is outlaw, who basically who have posted the same garbage with or without me. Remember how I said Outlaw was worrisome? :D

I unvote outlawauron

I vote Conegamer

There are other people I'd much rather see go before you, Cone, but no one seems to agree and well between you and prof, I'd rather keep prof.

Yeah, I'm not fine with your vote but I understand you won't be changing it until I deliver the goods. I would expect nothing less from a seasoned player, Spurge.

However, my advise is you're looking in the wrong place and drawing the wrong conclusions due to my unusual style. I get why you arrived at them, but that's just how I decided to play things and then slide into the game midway through (which I'd like to think I have at least started to achieve) and then have a little bit behind me in both the flow of the game and how to respond to and accuse people of suspicious activities. 

But yes, to get back to your question I wouldn't expect you to change your vote until I give a good enough reason for you to do so

I still don't understand what I have done to cause this suspicion, but that's up to you. Would like to hear why I've gone from effectively no suspicion to the prime suspect in your eyes, though.

You're not the prime suspect. Not even close. Did you read what I said in the post?