Some suck but not 50% of them. I think like 25% aren't that good but the rest are at least average.

I wonder how many people will reply to this thread without actually reading the OT... :p

I don't agree with you using it as a basis for your opinion of Nintendo as a whole (though that's the nature of opinions), but you do make valid points. The more games a publisher pushes out every year, the more of it that is likely to be seen as mediocre in the eyes of individual people.

Personally, i believe publishers/developers should be judged by the consistency that they push out their best titles, not their worst.

I don't play nintendo first party games anymore, not unless their new ip's. Wonderful 101 (owned by ninty) good. Mario bad

a lot. 

I don't think they suck; I just don't give a shit about most of them execpt Zelda and Metroid. (Sony and MS waste their ip's)

Its all made with children and families in mind. Nintendo doesn't go beyond a teen rating in their development. 

having bad taste is normal

Having opinions are normal too.

I kind of find that, generally speaking, Nintendo's titles have filled a part of my life best described as 'My Party Console.' Basically, when I have friends over and everyone plonks down on the couch for some gaming, we generally haul out a Nintendo console, because dat's where the local multiplayer goodness is at. Though I wouldn't say that Nintendo releases many games anymore that make me go 'Wooooow,' @_@ I must say, our parties get a lot more out of even the Gamecube than they do any of Microsoft's or Sony's titles.

I respect that u personally dont like many Nintendo games, there is nothing wrong with that but to say they suck just because they dont appeal to u seems a bit extreme.

I dont personally like the Beatles but I recognize that they are a great and very influential band, just because I dont like them doesnt mean they suck just not my personal preference.

So you're a Platinum Games fan then.