By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - My Top 10 reasons I hate the new Pokemon.

In my opinion:

4>3>2>1>6>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>5



Around the Network
drake_tolu said:

No.

Arceus is the best Pokémon, have all statistics 372, and PV 444.

Deoxy is more fast, but in one blow don't kill Arceus, and even in two, only in 3 kill Arceus... but Arceus with Judment and dark plate kill Deoxy in one blow.

Arceus>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Deoxy

Arceus sucks! He isnt worthy to be a god! They should have given him a better design imo!



If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)

https://www.youtube.com/user/RealGamingExpert

RealGamingExpert said:
drake_tolu said:
 

No.

Arceus is the best Pokémon, have all statistics 372, and PV 444.

Deoxy is more fast, but in one blow don't kill Arceus, and even in two, only in 3 kill Arceus... but Arceus with Judment and dark plate kill Deoxy in one blow.

Arceus>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Deoxy

Arceus sucks! He isnt worthy to be a god! They should have given him a better design imo!

ARCEUS DISINTEGRATE ALL POKEMON.



Chevinator123 said:

Pokemon needs massive change, it needs to evolve into a more traditional full 3D openworld RPG game. (preferably on console) (possibly a MMO, although that might be to ambitious)

They cant just keep doing the same stuff over and over again. more and more generations of pokemon is just making it worse, its so overwhelming, hundreds of completely forgotten/useless pokemon in the game.

If they make new generations of pokemon they need to completely remove the old ones from the game, would be much better imo.

The problem with this is A.) they want to keep selling handhelds so they are going to keep it on handhelds as far as main games go B.) That ends up limiting what they can do because Nintendo make super powerful handhelds to keep them affordable C.) They must retain the fanbase which loves the early ones.  If they were going to get rid of gens it would probably be some of the later ones.  I think they should keep the favorites from previous ones and limit it to like 5 from each gen for a game.  Maybe they could have a gen where they add less Pokemon




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

drake_tolu said:

ARCEUS DISINTEGRATE ALL POKEMON.

NOT STRONG ENOUGH!



If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)

https://www.youtube.com/user/RealGamingExpert

Around the Network

The design, just...





ErwinMoC said:

The design, just..

Yeah right...



If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)

https://www.youtube.com/user/RealGamingExpert

Mnementh said:
Chevinator123 said:

Pokemon needs massive change, it needs to evolve into a more traditional full 3D openworld RPG game. (preferably on console) (possibly a MMO, although that might be to ambitious)

They cant just keep doing the same stuff over and over again. more and more generations of pokemon is just making it worse, its so overwhelming, hundreds of completely forgotten/useless pokemon in the game.

If they make new generations of pokemon they need to completely remove the old ones from the game, would be much better imo.

I don't understand this. Why change a game that many fans like into something new and alienate existing fans? There could always be a completely new game that uses the changed recipe, but why destroy and existing IP for these wishes?

ok, or that would be fine i guess



Ka-pi96 said:

Sorry, but Mewtwo would destroy them both!

WHAT?



If you're interested in Nintendo content and understand german, maybe you want to take a look at my youtube channel! :)

https://www.youtube.com/user/RealGamingExpert

ErwinMoC said:

The design, just...




Klefki design is perfect. That little thing is the perfect prankster pokemon.