That is your opinion and you do not speak for everyone else. Have you even thought of perhaps, other reasons why people have complained? For instance, I don't see the worth because I seldomly play multiplayer. Perhaps, the people complaining do not know the full package behind TLOU: R... Who knows? But to hastily conclude that this thread exists because TLOU:R was not worth the $50 is silly.

Also, you had your say on this, so what is your motive of continuing to complain about this to other people who do see the remaster's worth? All you had to do is walk away, but clearly something is bothering you that is making you stay. Remember, the value of a product depends on the person.

what was your argument i dont remember ever hearing an argument that makes sense for why you woudlnt include the value of the DLC.  Please provide one.

retail price: 39.99 + 20 buck minimum for dlc

ps4 price: 50 bucks.

1) Market forces would make the companies adjust said pricing.  A product being "overpriced" is dictated by the result of its sales.  Unless of course it is a commodity wherein it will be highly price elastic.

2) Except that it is not a cross gen game.  It is a remaster.  Yes, if it WAS made TOGETHER with the PS3 version, then it would be a cross gen game.  But it wasn't.  Different development costs/marketing/etc go into a remaster vs a cross gen (as versions are already being developed for a cross gen all together while a remaster would need you to reassembe a new development team to upgrade the new product and a new marketing team/budget to sell it).  To make a solid case, you need to argue apples to apples.

No, hypotheticals are not how prices are made.  Actual consumer/competitor/cost data is used to determine pricing (unless of course you just want to guess at things).  But that's not the point, in this case, you're using a promotional product that doesn't exist (season pass) and a main product that no longer exists in the price (TLOU main game) that it was when the product DID exist. Not only that, you're using Amazon pricing and not Sony MSRP.

Completely hypothetical pricing cherry picking. 

Answer this:  What is TLOU MSRP as it exists for Sony today and if I wanted to get all the DLC RIGHT NOW how much would it cost me new from Sony?

3) Yes you are. And that's how many people here are taking it.  Calling something a fool's errand implies that it is something only fools do.  Doesn't matter if you directly say it, the implication is there. If you don't mean it that way, perhaps you need to dial down what you say to make it more palatable to the others here?

4) It's a promotional item offered for a limited time offered prior to actual product releases in order to cover some of the development costs.  In the industry I work in, that's called Pre-selling.  And yes, presold products tend to be cheaper.  Once the product is out, prices go up.

5) Actually, you did:

"And, once again, the current market price for TLOU PS3 is $30 new, NOT $60. It doesn't matter if the DLC is included. All of the DLC was valued, by Sony, at $20 one whole year ago. The same way the value of TLOU has gone down by 50%, it's more than safe to assume that the value of the DLC has gone down by 50% as well. 30+10 = 40."

Sounds to me that you think just becuase something was released a year ago, it should naturally go down in price.

He is right.  If you have not played TLOU on PS3 already, then $50 is a good deal.  However, if you already have the game and DLC, then its not really worth your money (in my opinion) for the better framerate and resolution.

Someone responds to me, and I respond to them. That's the reason anyone "continues to complain." It's called a discussion.

So I am getting ripped off for paying $50 for it? You didn't say that I was in the above quote... you just said I could get it cheaper if I waited longer. You said nothing about me getting ripped off. And if I am getting ripped off then explain to me how.

I can get the Halo bundle at Gamestop for $55. They are charging $60 and the games are all older than 1 year!! They are older than 1 year and they are charging $60!!!

Lol after reading a few of your post i dont think you understand how economics work...

I would also like to poi t out that if ND decided to release this game for $30 to match the PS3 version but did not include the DLC to justify the low price it would cost people MORE than they would be currently paying to get it with all the DLC. Think of it like a bundle

But as an early adopter you already knew that there were not going to be a lot of games to play at the start of the gen. Yet you bought in none the less because there had to be SOMETHING that you wanted or douldn't wait on(I know you didn't say anything about it in this post but just figured I would mention that). And sure Ps2 to Os3 was easier thanks to BC but that even got taken out of the PS3 after a short time now NO SYSTEM is BC so again you knew what you were going into now it is just a waiting game until the system has time to build up a substansial library.

As for a fair comparison okay how about this you bought a PS4 at launch now 1yr later they release a slimmer, more realiable  PS4 with a better GPU, chipset or whatever etc for $350 or $300. Does that mean they should give you a discount on getting that PS4 since you already bought one? Because in a way it is the same situation. 

And again NO ONE who currently owns this game is being forced to buy it. But for those who NEVER played the game it is indeed a good deal. It is also a good deal for those who HAVE played the game but NEVER got a chance to play/get any of the DLC. Now if they wanted they could purschase an "enhanced version" of the game with ALL the DLC inclded for about the same if not a little less than the regular version with all DLC.