PS4 leaded basicaly because of No Man Sky?
First it´s probaly not exclusive, for now, and second because this game is just promisses and expeculation. I would rather this game to follow the Minecraft strategy and build its reputation with the comunity and gamers.
famousringo said:
Eh, this sounds an awful lot like L4D's versus mode, except there's only one player and one playable character on the monster side and the Tank gets extra powers. Not seeing the part where Dr.Henry_Killinger was horribly, horribly wrong. |
I didnt claim he was horribly horribly wrong...unless thats not for me.
The game is built completely around this concept though...4 weaker soldiers with abilities etc. vs a monster that evolves as the game progresses. I've never seen anything like it from L4D to be honest. The soldiers and the monster have lots of abilities as well, some of which change over the course of the game and has a big impact on which team has the momentum.
The meta game also changes over the course of the match...if you are a monster you start off by trying to avoid the soldiers, slowly getting bigger, faster and more powerful. Eventually the game will shift to where the soldiers become the hunted.
Watching 30 minutes of gameplay with some commentary will make it quite clear that the game isnt a L4D clone..in fact this is the first time i heard it being called that. If you also consider that L4D is most known for frantic gunplay and high mob count..it really contrasts evolve quite glaringly.
Dr.Henry_Killinger said:
So your telling me you don't understand the concept of an opinion. Considering, I havent seen either of you call out some one for making an opinion on the internet before and this is neither the first post for either of you, I think it is safe to say you're both full of bullshit. Has every opinionated claim you two have made always been completely logical? Please, you want to judge me by the same standard you judge yourself fine, but I've seen both of you make opinions multiple times, so I don't know its a bit HYPOCRITICAL. I could post evidence of this, but its clearly as immature as calling me out for the lack of logic in my opinion. Because I said Evolve looked like an LFD clone, something obviously subjective to me, now I'm a troll. Right? Never fret, Its pointless to go over previous posts, but I won't hesitate to call you out whenever any I happen an apon an opininon made by you two. |
Posting ignorant statements as opinions can be called out.
For example, I can't say RACIST, SEXIST statements and say its my opinion and not get called out. Having a opinion doesn't give you the right to say anything.
And please call me out on my opinions. All I see is passive agressive attacks on me. If you have posts that I have that are hyporcritical post them.
For the bolded statement:
"If I called all ___people look like ___people, something obviously subjective to me, now I'm a troll. Right?" -- Its the same thing.
Dark Chaos said:
Posting ignorant statements as opinions can be called out. For example, I can't say RACIST, SEXIST statements and say its my opinion and not get called out. Having a opinion doesn't give you the right to say anything. And please call me out on my opinions. All I see is passive agressive attacks on me. If you have posts that I have that are hyporcritical post them.
For the bolded statement: "If I called all ___people look like ___people, something obviously subjective to me, now I'm a troll. Right?" -- Its the same thing. |
Sadly, I'm not suprised you're still going on about this.
Furthermore, my opinion was neither a fact nor derrogatory (as in racist, or sexist) and since I live in America, I do have the freedom of speech.
You can continue to be an asshole and chatise me for an opinion I made yesterday, or fucking grow up and drop it. Seriously, you're pointlessly trying to make an argument where their is none.
~ Mod Edit ~
This user was moderated by TruckOSaurus.
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
Guys, drop it please. It's not worth it.
Just a note to everyone who took part in the spirited (let's go with that) exchange with Dr. Henry Killinger. Although he ended up going too far by calling another user an asshole, some of you here displayed very poor behavior. Instead of going for attacking posts like "You're so wrong, lol", you could have explained why his assumption was wrong (like Shinobi-San did, thanks for that!). Especially after he specifically asked for it, it would have spared us a lot of useless bickering.
Signature goes here!
MoHasanie said:
I think that's fair. If the game isn't playable then they can't judge it properly. But its no big deal though cause the game will win loads of awards when its released. |
I agree with you Mo.
Shinobi-san said:
The game is built completely around this concept though...4 weaker soldiers with abilities etc. vs a monster that evolves as the game progresses. I've never seen anything like it from L4D to be honest. The soldiers and the monster have lots of abilities as well, some of which change over the course of the game and has a big impact on which team has the momentum. The meta game also changes over the course of the match...if you are a monster you start off by trying to avoid the soldiers, slowly getting bigger, faster and more powerful. Eventually the game will shift to where the soldiers become the hunted. Watching 30 minutes of gameplay with some commentary will make it quite clear that the game isnt a L4D clone..in fact this is the first time i heard it being called that. If you also consider that L4D is most known for frantic gunplay and high mob count..it really contrasts evolve quite glaringly. |
Yeah, the "horribly" part was mostly directed at... more dramatic posters. Full props to you for engaging constructively.
Consider me persuaded. The power shift between the two sides and the focus on a single adversary are indeed unique mechanics. Perhaps the unfair comparison is drawn because there are few notable examples of this kind of assymetric PvP.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
