This is your argument cherry pick 3-4 articles out of hundreds on the internet? Here is why your arguemnt that the entire community and media said Nintendo won:

http://www.trustedreviews.com/opinions/ps4-comes-out-top-in-the-battle-of-the-e3

http://www.edge-online.com/news/sonys-e3-2014-press-conference-greater-daring-and-diversity-seal-another-confident-ps4-victory/

http://whatculture.com/gaming/10-reasons-sony-won-e3-2014.php

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2014/06/10/gaming-geeks-declare-sony-the-winner-over-microsoft-at-e3-so-far/?mod=MW_latest_news

http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2014/06/09/sony-wins-e3-by-a-nose/

So again how dod the coimmunity and media declare nintendo a wnner wjhen as many said sony won?

http://news.yahoo.com/looks-sony-just-won-e3-130048938.html

Got any other cherry picked arguments?

As for your "The community said Nintendo won"?

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/15/who-is-winning-e3

81% of ign users say Sony won e3....

I have the biggest gaming media on my side. Oh wow yahoo, forbes, trusted review totally the go to sites for all your gaming news. You only have one good site

Edge is one of the biggest publications and forbes is the biggest financials one, 81% of ign viewers = community thinking Sony won..You are grasping at straws, agains hpow how the whole community and media thinks nintendo won, when I just showed that is falt wrong? Your entire argument is now down to dismissing anything that says sony won but if they say Nintendo won they are OK? That's not even an argument, that's denial.

IGN never said nintendo won either just zelda was #1 game.

Nintendo did have the best announcements BUT once the E3 hype dies down it'll be back to long droubts and no 3rd party support. Very few people get hyped off the multiplats shown at E3 yet most gamers will probably spend most of their playtime on the very same games once they release.

As a PC gamer practically all of my games are 3rd party multiplats and thats were 85% of my gaming takes place (I do own a WiiU but it barely makes a dent). I dont think its too different for most PC and console gamners.

Also Sony and Microsofts E3s suffered greatly because of leaks, they need to do a better job at keeping these secret. The best moments in MS and Sonys conferences were on all the unannounced/unleaked games  like Tomb Raider and Little Big Planet for example. Nintendos presentation was so effective because we knew next to nothing outside of Zelda and Xenoblade.

http://whatculture.com/gaming/10-reasons-sony-won-e3-2014.php

Opps more, time is not important right?

http://techland.time.com/2013/06/11/how-sony-may-have-won-e3-with-the-playstation-4/

http://www.theverge.com/2014/6/10/5796904/how-sony-won-e3-2014-the-gory-highlights-video

That community and media lol.

talk about hypocritical, I provide you with the articles and you immediately dismiss them. Not my fault you are salt and defensive

Umm you provided artciles I provided others to prove not the whole community or media declared nintendo a winner, then you dismissed them. On top of that, one fo the sites you used, IGN, what ou called the BIGGEST game site, 81% of IGN community said sony won,d estroying your own argument.

Plus the entertainment value of the direct and thorough coverage of the games shown. I find it particularly funny people would get immediately upset with "so basically nintendo won" 

No ones upset, but nintendo never won, showing 2 good games, zero indie or third party support is not winning. They only won for die hard nintendo fans who cannot see past there nintendo bubble. The industry is passign nintendo by.

2 good games? When you are desperate, hyperbole becomes a scape goat