By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Why you wouldn`t buy PS3 for 299$ or 199$?

Because the only game I would be at all interested in is GT5 and to pay minimum 260 dollars for one game is stupid.



 


 

Around the Network

he got in a accident with random person C.



at this point I don't see any reason to buy it at any price. But after a year or two it might be worth $250



(\__/)
( -'.'-)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.

Maybe you should ask yourself why haven't I bought the Wii at 250 dollars yet. Are you getting your Sony fanboy hat on or are you considering buying a Wii.



 


 

Most of the people on this forum (i'm looking at you starcraftand neos) wouldn't buy it at any price. Because A they hate sony and B by buying it they would be contradicting everything they've said about how crap the PS3 is and how its a total failure



Hi, i'm solojohlo and i'm pretty fucking awesome

Around the Network

250 Euro maybe if i feel like it and they have ff13

200 euro yeah, why not.

then i would also get a new TV



Any message from Faxanadu is written in good faith but shall neither be binding nor construed as constituting a commitment by Faxanadu except where provided for in a written agreement signed by an authorized representative of Faxanadu. This message is intended for the use of the forum members only.

The views expressed here may be personal and/or offensive and are not necessarily the views of Faxanadu.

1. LBP isn't out yet
2. I don't need a bluray player at this time

those two points cover why i don't need a ps3 right now, and i wouldn't buy one for mass market value or anything else like that.. money isn't the problem and what it can offer *me* is more important than just what it can offer



I would ask the question if you don't care about blu ray (which I don't) what makes the PS3 worth $200 or $300?  Additionally, I would ask you why you assume the 40 gig will have full backwards compatibility?  The 80 gig had software backwards compatibility and then it was removed in the 40 gig.  So really the only reason that makes sense is Sony doesn't want you buying a new shiny console to play old games.  And I haven't read anything that states they are working really hard to implement it.  Bc if they were it'd be done by now.



solojohlo said:
Most of the people on this forum (i'm looking at you starcraftand neos) wouldn't buy it at any price. Because A they hate sony and B by buying it they would be contradicting everything they've said about how crap the PS3 is and how its a total failure

Find me a SINGLE quote where I have said that the PS3 is a failure.  You may try to find one, you will fail.  What I have always maintained is that I will own all three console this generation, I just wont own the PS3 until it receives some compelling exclusives. Im sure these will come in time, and I would like BC to go with it.

What I have always said is that the existance of all three consoles creates beneficial competition. 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

because i don't need it? one game console (wii) is one console more than i should be playing already. damn you nintendo for wasting so much of my time.

if it's $199 and i don't have a TV set-top box to play NetFlix or some movie streaming device by then i'd be like "it's only $199. what's the worst that can happen?"

or maybe i should just stay away from it totally since then i'll have the temptation to play games, which is a bad habit to get into. i'll probably stay away from it since by then i'll probably have kids and definitely i'm not gonna have an additional game console at home.




the Wii is an epidemic.