+ Below
- No Man's Sky
Bunch of indie haters xD
Edit: lol guys, my game died like 200 posts in xD
https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png
New Entry:
Half-Life 3 - 100
+ results in addition of 10pts
- results in addition of 30pts
In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank
No Man's Sky +
Earthlock -
I know nothing about Below or Earthlock, so:
+ No Man's Sky
- No Man's Sky
All three games look like crap, so
-No Man's Sky
| Seece said: I'd like to do a game where the people are chosen and they base their choices objectively rather than petty wars. Should probably have made people list their games in order of best to worst (in terms of interest, quality, likely to buy ect) and then could perhaps see when they were ruining the game a bit better and call them out. But policing these threads never goes down well. |
If you do it again in the future you should try doing one at the end of the year. You could pick games that were Top 20-30 Metacritic released in 2014. Make it like a year end game. Also the point scheme favors the negative too much. A +2/-3 probably would have been better, but this was a first time and the idea was nice. The mini wars just kind of ruined the purpose I think.
+no mans sky
-below
Whelp, at least my favourites Dragon Age and Witcher held out quite long (not FF though). It would have been interesting to see how it would have turned if there were no petty wars. At least i can say that i didn't downvote any game that i'm actually intrested in or have a chance of buying.
Why not instead, have people put the order the games interest them. Everyone takes the list of games, orders them however they prefer them, and each rank gets a score added to it.
The whole hurt/heal thing, people are going to hurt games that they think are a threat, even if they're semi high up on their list, then when people eventually kill off the ones higher on their list, they have to go to the next highest which is lower than what they've already helped kill off. Then at the end we end up with several choices that next to no one cares about.
| Seece said: I'd like to do a game where the people are chosen and they base their choices objectively rather than petty wars. Should probably have made people list their games in order of best to worst (in terms of interest, quality, likely to buy ect) and then could perhaps see when they were ruining the game a bit better and call them out. But policing these threads never goes down well. |
what if we reversed things? all games start at zero points. players get a + 2 and -1 vote. it is a race to see what can break 100 points first. vote in the top 5 most anticipated titles as the winners.
kitler53 said:
|
Lots of good ideas, this is certainly a different way of doing things.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
