Mummelmann said:
|
John Lucas is articulate though this guy not so much. Doctre was definitely one of JL's "followers" but I don't think that it is him. I could be wrong though.
Are you scared? | |||
| Yes | 11 | 17.19% | |
| No | 38 | 59.38% | |
| Maybe | 5 | 7.81% | |
| When's Mahvel? | 10 | 15.63% | |
| Total: | 64 | ||
Mummelmann said:
|
John Lucas is articulate though this guy not so much. Doctre was definitely one of JL's "followers" but I don't think that it is him. I could be wrong though.
I think he is right.. but not the way he think..
What i think is..
There is a business war going on behind the curtain, and the us is struggle to get us and eu consumers to bye american producs.
I know Sony is japaness to.. but theire product is closser to Xone.. and first step in the (imo) "Conspiracy" is to get Nintendo to go 3. party..
If u look at it it. The big american gaming companys.. and look at the negative american press..
Ubisoft (french) are following now.. (they play ball, and can see that it's better to be on the "westeren" side) Sega and capcom are the only big true 3 party left.
Edit..
Disney is still onboard.. becourse the money is to big..
And i also thinks EA and other will be back when Nintendo and Wii-U strike back. and get better sales.. bigger user group = big money.. And we all know.. They can't say no to money. (big companys would sell weapon to the enemy, if the monye is big)
Mummelmann said:
|
were you on joystiq back in their 2006-2010 heyday, mummel?

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
Mr Khan said:
were you on joystiq back in their 2006-2010 heyday, mummel? |
Not as a member, only reader! I did post a little bit on Gamespot (shudder) and IGN though but not for very long.
| Never said: If the Wii U had good sales it would have much better third party support. Maybe less than a Sony or ms console with similar sales, who knows. But would get enough third party games to back up it's first party exclusives. |
Because that worked so well for the Wii.
Mr Khan said:
I agree, especially since we had that very public, verbal commitment of "unprecedented support" E3 2011, which devolved to average support by E3 2012, which by New Years 2013 had devolved into "absolute 0 support once we release Need For Speed, even beneath our NFL contracts." How do you go from very high to absolutely nothing in that amount of time? EA was known as the publisher that would make games for anyone, and were contractually required to do so by several of their licenses. Not to make this into another thing about EA specifically, but it does highlight that unusual things happen between Nintendo and third parties that are beyond the pale of "normal" interactions for Sony or Microsoft. |
Verbal commitments mean nothing in this industry. Nintendo should have made an actual deal with EA for exclusive DLC or marketing for certain titles. No idea why their partnership dissolved, but putting contracts in place would have kept EA supporting the WiiU.
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
That's why they call him the doctor damage controlling fanboy (Well that is what they call him)
IMO he's half fanboy, half correct.
| PigPen said: This guy is 98% right. The only thing I disagree on is that developers, analyst and game journalist are fanboys too. Sony having Insurance, Music division, TVs, Phones, Movie Division and Laptops can make fans of Sony. The media is in bed with these mega corporations (Microsoft too) and want Nintendo out. You know it's bad when game developers and analyst talk with hate openly about Nintendo. I remember the doom articles and videos before the Wii U launched. What was Nintendo thinking naming it Wii U, It will be irrelevant when the new playstation and Xbox comes out, Nintendo needs new IP's...... The fact is, the Wii U eDRAM is better then the PS4 GDDR5. |

