JWeinCom said: 1. Convenience don't have to dig up an old console and controller if you have a sudden desire for an old game. 2. Systems break, so a five year old system may not be best 3. You can then sell the old system to defray the cost. 4. Hand me down systems are great for families. 5. Limited HDMI ports. 6. People may not have the older system. 7. Clutter. Some of us live in small apartments and a little space goes a long way. Lots of reasons. I don't particularly mind that the PS4/XBone aren't backwards compatible, but the fact that the controllers aren't BC is ridiculous. I can't think of a real reason for them not to be aside from it being in Sony and MS's best interest. |
Pretty much this........ esp. no. 6, 7. A Wii/PS2 etc are still a little easier to find than their predecessors (depending on your region/area). Same goes for the wii and wii U. Can't find/buy a PSOne? then find a PS2. You will avoid the clutter, costs, and headaches of finding both just to play their games. Can't get a GC, then get a wii, they're as common as dirt. Sure you can't play the GB Player on (that's a differen't story) but you'll have acess to a boat load of software.
Also to thoes that suggest a PC, if only it can be that simple for a lot of people. IMO it's cheaper to go and find a console (used) that can play both its own games and its predecessor's games than to bone up the money to get a powerfull enough PC (or to unpgrade it).
If the console doesn't have BC I won't throw a fit, I'll just keep the older console. On the other hand BC does raise the costs of manufacuring but who's idea was it to jack up the costs in terms of hardware in the first place? As a I recall it was a easy for companies like Sony to include it on the PS2 Now they jump ship and removed it with the PS3 because the system was already pricey to begin with.