| Bodhesatva said: But Sony isn't doing it. I think there would be less objection if Sony were, but Sony isn't. It's a glaring flaw in your sarcastic reply, Gamer Girl. It isn't "everyone else" already doing it, it's "Microsoft and but not Sony."
|
How long will that remain such? Free online is definitely a competitive advantage for a console company at this point however when both your competitors offer paid online service, the company must ask itself is it better to be the "free alternative" or the "cheapest alternative?"
With Sony's games division being in the red for so long, I wonder how powerful that distinction will really turn out to be.














