Wow... really?
I mean there is no gipsy minority soldier in any of the CoD games so lets start a #rroma4guns movement... seriously, people are being offended by anything these days.
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!
Wow... really?
I mean there is no gipsy minority soldier in any of the CoD games so lets start a #rroma4guns movement... seriously, people are being offended by anything these days.
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!
| hunter_alien said: Wow... really? I mean there is no gipsy minority soldier in any of the CoD games so lets start a #rroma4guns movement... seriously, people are being offended by anything these days. |
Who was offended? Seriously who was it?

| nitekrawler1285 said: It's really easy for people to say this issue is no big deal. As an Black gay male I hardly ever get that opportunity. Outside of a few EA games and Dragon's Dogma I have never had the opportunity to be represented that way in a game. For me it's a big deal. Further more I don't see any issues with the sales of the Sims, Mass Effect, and Dragon's Dogma. I also don't recall any uproar over it being included in those games so I find it hard to believe there would be a massive uproar about it for Tomodatchi Life. |
I hear you! There's never any white Yorkshire males (of any sexual orientation) in video games either :( I feel we need more representation too.
And Dragon's Dogma, Sims etc don't allow me to recreate such an under represented demographic either.
MikeRox said:
And Dragon's Dogma, Sims etc don't allow me to recreate such an under represented demographic either. |
I hope that gaming becomes diverse and inclusive enough that you will get to experience it someday.
curl-6 said:
Gays are frequently beaten up and assaulted in the streets for being gay. |
Only when they run their mouth too much by insulting and disrespecting the general population. No one is attacking them just for being what they are. They are being attacked because they believe they are allowed to take a shit on people's beliefs,culture, religion and tradition
Kane1389 said:
|
I guess the way you're running your mouth you're taking a shit on my beliefs at the moment, so I guess that gives me the right to beat you up, right? Lovely way of seeing things. What kind of religion allows beating up people? Because as a Christian I know that you simply can't do that.



Kane1389 said:
|
You're running your mouth and disrespecting them, does that give them the right to kick your ass?
If your traditions and culture mean assaulting those who disagree, then your traditions and cultures are fascist and inhumane.
Kane1389 said:
|
Do you read the nonsense you type before you post it?
curl-6 said:
Gays are frequently beaten up and assaulted in the streets for being gay. |
That wasn't the point of DolPhanTendo's post though. A lot of people are beaten up and assaulted for a variety of reasons, some superficial others more rational. While all people have the right to not be assaulted (for whatever reason), it is not the right of any person to demand inclusion in private activites, groups, business, or property. There is a right for all people to freely association with whomever they wish to. I say this as a gay/bisexual/mostly attracted to men (whatever you wanna call it) male, I oppose the sentiment among certain gays that using force to get somebody to bake you a cake or to get Nintendo to include same-sex partners in a game is moral. It removes Nintendo or the bakery's right to property and right to freely associate with whomever these groups wish to, even more in the case of Nintendo -- it intereferes with Nintendo's right to free speech if the government were to determine which content must or mustn't exist in the game. There is no right to a cake nor is there a right to a game that represents your, particular, individual life. I do understand though if potential customers want to bring it to Nintendo's attention that they feel excluded by a game they think they'd enjoy, which it seems the OP is speaking about. That is fine. That is the market at work. But this isn't a matter of rights, which some in this thread - in particular - have claimed. It is a matter of a private business appealing to consumers, and what it should do to reach certain markets in the future.
sc94597 said:
That wasn't the point of DolPhanTendo's post though. A lot of people are beaten up and assaulted for a variety of reasons, some superficial others more rational. While all people have the right to not be assaulted (for whatever reason), it is not the right of any person to demand inclusion in private activites, groups, business, or property. There is a right for all people to freely association with whomever they wish to. I say this as a gay/bisexual/mostly attracted to men (whatever you wanna call it) male, I oppose the sentiment among certain gays that using force to get somebody to bake you a cake or to get Nintendo to include same-sex partners in a game is moral. It removes Nintendo or the bakery's right to property and right to freely associate with whomever these groups wish to, even more in the case of Nintendo -- it intereferes with Nintendo's right to free speech if the government were to determine which content must or mustn't exist in the game. There is no right to a cake nor is there a right to a game that represents your, particular, individual life. I do understand though if potential customers want to bring it to Nintendo's attention that they feel excluded by a game they think they'd enjoy, which it seems the OP is speaking about. That is fine. That is the market at work. But this isn't a matter of rights, which some in this thread - in particular - have claimed. It is a matter of a private business appealing to consumers, and what it should do to reach certain markets in the future. |
The people who opposed to the guy making a request for homosexual relationships are the ones who brought up rights. The vast majority (at least based on this thread) who support the miiquality do not se it as a right but as a request to Ninty. And as you said, there's nothing wrong with that.
