| crissindahouse said:
When games like Blue Dragon and LO released I was pretty sure that they will stay on 360 so that I would have bought a 360 interested in these games. If you bought a PS3 when you saw these games releasing on 360 it's people like you tesponsible for low sales. It's someone like you who wanted to buy a PS3 without these games. If I would be a fan of games like CoD and would see them only on a Nintendo system I would simply buy this console and not "I don't buy the console because these games should be on PS4 and/or Xbox One". If people don't buy consoles for the games they get and are instead like "games have to release on consoles I buy" then it sound to me as if they are biased against this system.
|
That's excellent if you can buy multiple consoles. Many people can't. You're not understanding my logic: my console of choice is based on my gaming preferences. If the Xbox One had 30 games, and the PS4 only 3, I'd still buy a PS4 because I enjoy Sony ip's, and have no experience with MS ip's. If I like jrpgs, the last thing I'd think is to buy a Xbox to play jrpgs. The fact that Tales never released on the 360 again (and was a million seller on the PS3, unlike Vesperia), Ni no Kuni was PS3 exclusive (also a million seller, unlike LO and BD) and Eternal Sonata got an enhanced PS3 port (which sold better than the 360 version) pretty much proves my point. Making exclusive jrpgs on the Xbox is about the most illogical thing you can do.
Serious_frusting said:
Pretty much this.
Also why does your sig have 15 in the middle? Is it because you dont count 14 and wanted to have the latest FF to come out displayed in the middle? It just seems strange
|
I didn't include XI and XIV because... well, it wouldn't fit. And I haven't played them, so it seemed natural. I did play FFXIV on a friends' house though, and had a pretty good first impression. If I had the money and the time, I'd play it.
And yes, I wanted to put the latest FF on the middle.