Yeah he's fairly dependable to overrate Microsoft and underrate Sony. I remember when real Xbox fans like Angry Joe were giving MS the deserved middle finger for the DRM reveal (that helped convince them to fix it), Sessler was still a shill for Microsoft.

Infamous definitely doesn't seem like a 5/5, but not a 3/5 either. Just like Titanfall isn't a 5/5, but isn't a 3/5 either. You can always tell the fanboys in the review world by how they slant things depending on which brand is on the box. Guaranteed if Titanfall was a Sony exclusive, he would have harped on the weaknesses and given it 2/5 or 3/5, while giving ISS a 5/5 GOTY.

In short, he's worthless garbage.

Too bad! Mario games always had no 'story' but gameplay was enough to put the game on 90+ on metacritic.

(Sobbing) but it looked so good at E3.  Then those gameplay trailers came out and it didn't look so good anymore.

Dissapointed, hope people can enjoy it or Infamous.

They still haven't learned from last gen.

The only part of Infamous which devs didn't really like was the story and the tying in of the decisions affecting the story.

Yes, but much like Titanfall when you balance storyline and gameplay in a game within a genre which provides both if one lacks it affects the score. Infamous was actually praised for its gameplay over the story portion.

Braking news! As of this thread very good=flop. Now I wonder if the thread itself is a flop.

We should discuss why this thread is a flop. The answer is: It's too stupid to be serious and it's not funny at all to be trolling. 2 out of 10 "uninspired".

I thought Titanfall was in the OP???? Yeah I checked it was lol. So it was in it from the beginning then lol. Which is no big deal seeing as it was a joke thread that somehow turned into what it is now lol.