I think another 2/3D mario should be on 3DS and a full out 3D mario (SM64+SMG) on WiiU

I don't get the hate for 3D Land. I mean, it's no 3D World, but it's still a great game nonetheless.

I would be quite happy to have another like it on the 3DS.

Possibly. But I do not feel, however, that 3D World (which was much better than Land, though Land was decent), will be the last 3D Mario Wii U gets. I think that the next major 3D Mario will be on Wii U.

But that would be a crazy long time from now!

When would these games release?

TBH 3DS this year we kno of the library in 1st half of year, we dont got **** on 2nd half excluding SSB. Im willing to guess a couple games coming out and they would be LoZ MM 3D + A New Metroid + SM3DL2 (i really think 2015 though)

I don't think so. I expect a new 3D Mario for Wii U because it needs something open world^^ But I won't say it isn't possible.

weren't both 3d land and 3d world made by the Galaxy team?

If this is the case I would assume we would most likely see a successor to Galaxy presumably on the wii u before we see a 3d mario game on the 3ds but who knows? I think this has been hinted at somewhere.

I really liked 3dland and was happy to see a superior follow up on the wii u so Im happy for the time being and don't get the hate.

People really need to quit using the term "open world" to describe 3D Mario games. There never has been an "Open World" Mario, not ever. So people pointing back to "like Mario 64 or Sunshine" when using that term, I feel, are incorrect. Mario 64 had multiple paths you could take, depending on the stars you had collected, and it had a castle hub you could explore, little by little, as well as a very limited outside area you could play around in (that was honestly only created as a quick way for people to play around and learn the 3D Mario controls for the first time).

Sunshine, while the main city would seem more "open world-ish", at the end of the day, it wasn't a very large city, and it still only served as a central hub where you hopped to other, more limited levels, just like Mario 64.

I'm just saying, I think people are getting to the point these days where they are overusing and misusing that term, "open world". The implication of that phrase is that you have a game world where you can just about go anywhere you feel like, often right from the start. In that sense, the original Legend of Zelda was a decent early example (one of the most prominent early examples in fact) of so-called "open world" (or as it was once known, "Adventure") gaming. But these days, when you talk about "open world", you're usually referencing something like GTA or Elder Scrolls. And those examples are far more accurate.

Would it be cool to have an "open world" Mario if they found a way to do it right? Sure. But I don't think a 3D Mario needs to be "open world" to be huge and epic. Those things aren't always the same.

That is most likely the case. I believe the next 3D Mario will come out for the Wii U and will most likely have higher production values than 3D World. If anything, the 3DS *may* get another 2D Mario game.

Hard to tell, on one hand I want another 3D Mario on 3DS but on the other hand 3D Land was fucking horrible and another game like that would just be disgraceful.