By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Screenshots Directly from inside Second Son early buyer ; Downgrade Debunked

Dr.Henry_Killinger on 15 March 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
For pics posted on this thread only: Texture, enveironment and models all look blend to me.

Also, who could considered a 30fps game any kind of technical achiviment?

typical Dark_Feanor



In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank

Around the Network
gooch_destroyer on 15 March 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
For pics posted on this thread only: Texture, enveironment and models all look blend to me.

Also, who could considered a 30fps game any kind of technical achiviment?




AbrahamHamdan on 15 March 2014
GribbleGrunger said:

Just look at these folks:

O_O





starcraft on 15 March 2014

The game looks great. There is a clear downgrade from E3 certainly, but its still amongst the best looking games on new consoles so far.

Realistically we're all just expecting too much from this generation of consoles. They just are not as bleeding edge for their time as PS3 and X360 were. The games look great, don't stress.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

FATALITY on 15 March 2014
starcraft said:
The game looks great.  There is a clear downgrade from E3 certainly, but its still amongst the best looking games on new consoles so far.

Realistically we're all just expecting too much from this generation of consoles. They just are not as bleeding edge for their time as PS3 and X360 were. The games look great, don't stress.

where? stop spreading fud 



”The environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry” (Jack Tretton, 2009)

Around the Network
BeElite on 15 March 2014
Squall_Leonhart said:
BeElite said:
Game looks awesome, will look better on my 65" w85 once i fuck around with its setting and find the ideal setting for ISS

How do you find that TV? I'm torn between the 55" W9  and the 65" W85. Both amazing lookin. TV's but I heard that the 65" loses image quality due to the larger size!  

pretty awesome, went from a 58 plasma to it.  know thought there are so many damn settings on it, some times takes skill to optimize it best.  If ur hardcore FPS you might want the 55 as its faster, but havent noticed any issues on the 65 im gaming from about 8 feet from it. 

also sony is rolling out new tvs soon, might want to wait for them or a big sale on these two.



EB1994 on 15 March 2014
starcraft said:
The game looks great. There is a clear downgrade from E3 certainly, but its still amongst the best looking games on new consoles so far.

Realistically we're all just expecting too much from this generation of consoles. They just are not as bleeding edge for their time as PS3 and X360 were. The games look great, don't stress.

"Clear downgrade"



poklane on 15 March 2014
EB1994 said:
starcraft said:
The game looks great. There is a clear downgrade from E3 certainly, but its still amongst the best looking games on new consoles so far.

Realistically we're all just expecting too much from this generation of consoles. They just are not as bleeding edge for their time as PS3 and X360 were. The games look great, don't stress.

"Clear downgrade"

If people compare things, FFS at least use something like an Elgato, and not compressed Youtube BS. You can clearly see in that comparison that if the pic from March 2014 wasn't shit quality, it would be equal if not better than E3.



fps_d0minat0r on 15 March 2014
Dark_Feanor said:
For pics posted on this thread only: Texture, enveironment and models all look blend to me.

Also, who could considered a 30fps game any kind of technical achiviment?


30fps is an achievement considering numerous non 1080p games like dead rising and titanfall drop below 20 fps.



EB1994 on 15 March 2014
poklane said:
EB1994 said:

"Clear downgrade"

If people compare things, FFS at least use something like an Elgato, and not compressed Youtube BS. You can clearly see in that comparison that if the pic from March 2014 wasn't shit quality, it would be equal if not better than E3.

Huh? I am saying the March version looks better. I know it's low quality, but you can tell in the background there is much more detail. They have added a big DUP checkpoint area. You can even see the water splashing near the bridge whereas in the E3 footage it looks like it was covered in fog. There isn't a downgrade.