Anything above 90 I consider bad.
80 is the sweet spot.
Bad Meta score? | |||
Anything below a 90 | 17 | 5.78% | |
Anything below a 80 | 36 | 12.24% | |
Anything below a 70 | 128 | 43.54% | |
Anything below a 60 | 76 | 25.85% | |
Anything 0-59 | 30 | 10.20% | |
Unless it's a perfect 100 it's bad. | 7 | 2.38% | |
Total: | 294 |
Areym said: Anything below 60 is not worth the time or money, |
I agree that Knack is not a game worth the time or money.
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
i dont read reviews anymore as I found myself enjoying games rated 6 more then a 9 so waste of time caring, I pick what looks interesting to me.
AZWification said:
I agree that Knack is not a game worth the time or money. |
Whch is why I rented that bitch. HEEEEEY OOOOHHHH!
As for time, I admit i did have fun with it. The first 8 chapters were alright. Around chapter 11, I wanted it over already, it felt like a chore. The last chapter brought the fun back so this would be one of my exceptions. Plus, I like knack's design.
Below 70.
Games 70-79 I consider good games with one or two cons that hold it back from greatness. Those games I see on a case by case basis.
I couldn't care less about a game's Metascore.
I am the Playstation Avenger.
|
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.