By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - What do you consider a bad Meta score for video games?

 

Bad Meta score?

Anything below a 90 17 5.78%
 
Anything below a 80 36 12.24%
 
Anything below a 70 128 43.54%
 
Anything below a 60 76 25.85%
 
Anything 0-59 30 10.20%
 
Unless it's a perfect 100 it's bad. 7 2.38%
 
Total:294

Anything above 90 I consider bad.

80 is the sweet spot.



Around the Network
Areym said:
Anything below 60 is not worth the time or money,

I agree that Knack is not a game worth the time or money.



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

i dont read reviews anymore as I found myself enjoying games rated 6 more then a 9 so waste of time caring, I pick what looks interesting to me.



 

 

AZWification said:
Areym said:
Anything below 60 is not worth the time or money,

I agree that Knack is not a game worth the time or money.

Whch is why I rented that bitch. HEEEEEY OOOOHHHH!

As for time, I admit i did have fun with it. The first 8 chapters were alright. Around chapter 11, I wanted it over already, it felt like a chore. The last chapter brought the fun back so this would be one of my exceptions. Plus, I like knack's design.



"Trick shot? The trick is NOT to get shot." - Lucian

Below 70.

Games 70-79 I consider good games with one or two cons that hold it back from greatness. Those games I see on a case by case basis.



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network

I couldn't care less about a game's Metascore.



I am the Playstation Avenger.