I am sure Titanfall will not be in the 90's...

Its small campaign will push it into the 80's...

I doubt it will fall into the 70s...

I think reviews won't be very high but not because of the games quality but because it is one of these games which some will hate because it's pretty much only about playing online and this will be not enough for some. and maybe because it is super fast and that could be a problem for some reviewers, not everyone can handle that (when i see some let's players and how bad they are even in slower games i can just imagine how bad some reviewers are in titanfall)

but i think the embargo is just standard nowadays.

Imo, it's because of the 360 version. I have a suspicion it and the Xbone version are on par with one another.

The 360 version isnt coming out at the same time as the other two though...

Oh yeah, I forgot. Strike what I said then.

Reviews don't mean anything when it comes to games like this. It sold the minute it was revealed at E3. There is nonthing that can be done to stop this. Preloading the PC Version right now.

That's early.

Aluminium shortage from all the foil hats

I'm inclined to think so, yes.

Not sure what I'd think about a review that wasn't based upon the actual gold release. Seeing as how we essentially have an online only game and that servers for said game aren't active with XBL users, I'm not sure what the point of a full review would be.

Based on the beta? Based upon what one thinks the gold release will be like?

Titanfall is such major/important release that an embargo resulting from a thinly veiled attempt to hide a poor or broken game would be completely ineffective. I think the simple truth is the game simply isn't active and running so there's nothing to review yet.

Plus the vast majority of previews out there from reliable (non-biased) sources have been nothing but positive.