Did you read my post? It basically answered your question. Yes, we know Batman will win, but HOW he'll win is entertaining to me because he isn't an overpowered character like Superman. What's even worse is that Batman and Superman share a universe. This basically makes Batman pointless because Superman can basically one hit every villain of Batman. Imagine playing as Superman in Arkham City.

Just because someone is liked doesn't mean you can relate to him. I mean, can Christians relate to the biblical Jesus? That would seem like quite an arrogant statement to me. 

Someone should really do a study to explain the difference between Franco-Belgian comics and American ones. Why does America like overpowered superheroes so much? I can't answer that question, but I have some ideas as to why that would be. 

That is the whole point of the discussion, Superman (or any other character from Warner Brothers) should have its own game, with its own settings and according level of villains. But they are not giving an opportunity to anyone but Batman, and is getting boring. The idea is not that Superman, or Wonder Woman, or Green Lantern, is shoe fit on an Arkham game, on the contrary they should get their own games, from a good studio, so more Batman is a missed oportunity that screams greedy and playing safe.

I would love to play a good Superman game, with figths on outer space, brawling against Darkseid and Mongul, protecting the city and doing all the stuff that only HE can do. Or imagine a Wonder Woman game as an action title like Devil May Cry or God of War, that goes deep into the mythology of the character, with all the Gods, intrigue and fantasy that appear on the comic. The possibilities are endles and DC has the characters that are both loved and recognized by the people, but is turning into a 1 trick bat-pony and that is dissapointing for many.

That is the whole point of the discussion, Superman (or any other character from Warner Brothers) should have its own game, with its own settings and according level of villains. But they are not giving an opportunity to anyone but Batman, and is getting boring. The idea is not that Superman, or Wonder Woman, or Green Lantern, is shoe fit on an Arkham game, on the contrary they should get their own games, from a good studio, so more Batman is a missed oportunity that screams greedy and playing safe.

I would love to play a good Superman game, with figths on outer space, brawling against Darkseid and Mongul, protecting the city and doing all the stuff that only HE can do. Or imagine a Wonder Woman game as an action title like Devil May Cry or God of War, that goes deep into the mythology of the character, with all the Gods, intrigue and fantasy that appear on the comic. The possibilities are endles and DC has the characters that are both loved and recognized by the people, but is turning into a 1 trick bat-pony and that is dissapointing for many.

Someone should really do a study to explain the difference between Franco-Belgian comics and American ones. Why does America like overpowered superheroes so much? I can't answer that question, but I have some ideas as to why that would be. 

You're right of course, but I still don't like superheroes like Superman. Any other superhero that isn't overpowered deserves a chance in my book. 

If after this trilogy Rocksteady makes another Batman game I can understand your frustrations. I see them like Retro Studios, let them make their trilogy and after that they can move on to a new franchise. 

It does not have to be Superman (it is my favorite character), but there is a good list from which Warner Brothers (owners of DC Comics) can choose from.

The Arkham games ALREADY are a trilogy (Asylum, City and Origins), so this is actually the 4th game of the series, also Rocksteady had a long time to prepare for a new title and instead of bringing something new to a new hardware, they are developing more Batman, that I am sure will be great, but play very similar to the previous ones. Great for those who like the character and wanted more content but is a little bit dissapointing for those who wanted something else, something new and different.

@bolded: That's why people refer to it as the final game in ROCKSTEADY's trilogy. It's their third Batman Arkham game. Origins was made by an other studio entirely.

I don't think Scarecrow is the main villain—he's just assembling them. 

http://batman-news.com/2014/03/04/batman-arkham-knight-trailer-box-art-photos/

Arkham Knight is going to probably be the main villain of the game. It doesn't say so directly but with the title of the game I can assume that in some capacity he will be the main antagonist.

I don't know about a Superman game—then again a Batman game didn't seem possible until Arkham Asylum—but I feel that a Wonder Woman game would be awesome. Her mythology is interesting now with the gods added that I would love to see Rocksteady tackle her character next. A Justice League game would be great too, but the scale of it would have to be massive I assume.

Don't be mad Superchunk, I already told you before E3 that Wii U won't have 3rd party support. You were stubborn and wrong. Just get a PC or PS4 to play games you like.

Not to mention all the Star Wars games that won't come to Wii U either...so you don't really have much choice.