| kupomogli said: In before Nintendo fans make comment about Wii U having more games because of the one year lead. |
Aw you got me :P
Current consoles: Wii U, Gaming PC
Add me on Wii U! Adamjh99
Add me on Steam! GamingByAdam
| kupomogli said: In before Nintendo fans make comment about Wii U having more games because of the one year lead. |
Aw you got me :P
Current consoles: Wii U, Gaming PC
Add me on Wii U! Adamjh99
Add me on Steam! GamingByAdam
" *pre-emptive appologie to nintendo fans. wiiU was not considered for this analysis." It's understandable. Leaving 3D World out of the discussion makes make this a fair fight. :)
---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---
BMaker11 said:
How many of those games are yearly sports titles from 2005 and before November 2006 (MLB, Boxing, NBA, NFL, NHL, Nascar, FIFA, etc.) or the likes of GH2 and CoD2 (games with multiplatform releases on 360 just because it came out first)? You're trying to simplify things that shouldn't be simplified to try and prove a point that isn't there. I mean, is the 360 library really "superior" because of NBA Live 06? Come on buddy, you can do better than that |
That tired excuse alone doesn't make up the entire gap. Not even close. A large reason for the gap is due to XBLA. Yet, it somehow doesn't matter comapred to a few PS3 high profile, retail, AAA, non-Move, exclusives. Go figure.
And now, we have people like the OP using lists to drive the same point home as I am that lists > reality. Its hypocritical.
Big name games >>> all else. If I am wrong, then 360 would be known today as the gamers true console in the 7th gen, as evidence by the list.

In this day and age, with the Internet, ignorance is a choice! And they're still choosing Ignorance! - Dr. Filthy Frank


PS4 is the best console to buy right now, agreed. You pay 400 euros for a mediocre console with hardly any games worth playing you can't play on a last gen console instead of paying 500 euros for the exact same thing. But hey I've got a better idea, why not refrain from buying one at all! That saves 400 euros instead of only 100.

| sales2099 said: Gamers don't care for lists, they care for the big name games above all else. Which is why the below is more fitting: |
You ignored Resogun, DC Universe Online and Injustice: Gods Among Us.
You are also ignoring the most important exclusives:
$400 price > $500 price
Free PS+ Games > Nothing
Although I do agree that based on the hype, Titanfall > Any single PS game (specifically when multiplayer is concerned). The only game that I see challenging this is Destiny, but that is not scheduled to be released until the fall.
| kowenicki said:
except in this case when theif is wrong, not once, but twice in the list. reputable source indeed. |
I was just making an attempt at humor via a reference to lighten the mood. Point was english is bit weird.

DM235 said:
You ignored Resogun, DC Universe Online and Injustice: Gods Among Us. You are also ignoring the most important exclusives: $400 price > $500 price Although I do agree that based on the hype, Titanfall > Any single PS game (specifically when multiplayer is concerned). The only game that I see challenging this is Destiny, but that is not scheduled to be released until the fall. |
Again, those just aren't system sellers in their own right. Great games, I am not denying that. I have not seen any PS fan online or in real life cite those games as absolutely must-have reasons to buy a PS4. In the end, it comes down to the big name exclusives or in Titanfalls case, multiplats not available on the competition.
Price, public perception, and brand carried over from PS3s last years are its biggest asset. Games (as of now), not so much.
That said, PS4 will have (and has now) amazing games. But as of now X1 has more big name variety/buzz.
None of the games listed on the PS4 excite me at all, I see is a bunch of indies and multiplats. Where are the "OMG DAY ONE PURCHASE" exclusives?
The exclusives released on the X1 so far are okay, but not worthy of a $50-$60 price tag. I'll wait til they're $30 or less.