I would praise anything for money lolol

Didnt realize that 70 meant a badscore....

When I come to this site seeing threads about metacretic and how its religion to some gamers sickens me. It seems as if gamers cant make up a decison about a game until a certain site tells them.

Worst of all are the nindento fanboys....I dont care that skyward sword scored or sold insanely well. I still think it sucks compared to all other zelda games.

lol these reviews are all over the damn place. A low 70 ain't bad but who knows the score might continue to decline.

Still better than I have expected tbh, thought it will end to in mid to high 60s.

This comment is so wrong in so many ways.

saying 'I hope you run under a bus' is like the same thing.

smh

Well I'm going to rent it, it seems interesting and its not a huge time sink.

IGN's reviewer said he completed it in 15 hours along with most side missions.

I'm just wondering..
Does a game have to be in green on meta to justify a purchase?

I expected more from the franchise but given its long term dormancy the quality of the end product was up in the air.

Off to go cancel my pre-order.

As a long time Thief fan, I couldn't care less about the reviews.....I'll judge for myself. Tbh I don't really trust any reviewers anymore. I stopped giving a damn after they shit all over Remember Me

A mild disappointment after the big Duke Nukem Forever one. At least this shouldn't be total crap, I'll wait for it to be properly debugged and a lot cheaper. Not that I could play it with my current PC, anyway, but the same applies to The Witcher 2 that I bought anyway as soon as they released the Enhanced Edition, to give them my little part of their well deserved support and credit.
Once again, publishers and devs are taught that adding fancy graphics to a respected old franchise, but dumbing it down (or even if not, putting little effort in gameplay and level design, and generally rushing all that's different from graphics) doesn't work. Will they ever learn?