irstupid said:
While i do agree with you, it is a slippery slope. I mean right now we allow business to deny service to people for not wearing shirts, not wearing a tie, waring a baseball cap backwards, ect. Bascially for not fitting their dress code. But if we start getting into denying people for religious beliefs, or sexual orientation, how long until we are back onto having white only water fountains, ect. If this law does get passed I hope for one that the business that refuse gays go out of business. i hope that the capitlistic envirionment makes this law pointless. The consumers cast their own vote by not eating or going to establishments that refuse gay entry. I'm all for giving business' rights, but I hope that us consumers are smart enough to vote our wallets away from stupid laws. Heck let this law pass, then let every business who is stupid enough to deny gays loose a shit ton of money and go out of business. That would almost be the best. The law may acutally benefit mankind by putting those idiots out of business and take away thier money. |
I certainly agree, it is a slippery slope. Right now it's homosexuals, tomorrow it's hispanics, blacks, etc. Hell there could even be a law where all discrimination is allowed and Black business owners can refuse whites if they want.
But I'm glad you saw the point I was making, and didn't just call me a homophobe for saying I support this law (in a sense). I hope the true nature of capitalism, and the desire to make money (by having a full hotel, restaurant, etc.) is more important than one's irrational hate of gays.
I bolded your paragraph that I really agree with! Not only will the businesses that utilize this law lose gay customers...but they will lose straight customers who boycott it.