Wright said:
kitler53 said:
Wright said:
kitler53 said:
journey is art because the artist was trying to create art. Cod,.. not so much. the artistic value was never the focus of the game director.
|
So art can't be commercial now?
|
where did i ever say anything even remotely close to that?
|
Not focusing on the artistic value doesn't mean a game can't be art. Cod is art. Commercial art. 
|
again, not at all what i said. take hynad's post for instance. ...an engineer comes along and creates a urinal. s/he puts a lot of though into the design but approaches it from a very pragmatic focus: how do I make it easy to install, minimize back splash, easy to clean, cheap to manufacture. this engineer creates a thing but at no point considered how a person will emotionally react to it. not art. along comes r. mutt and s/he uses that thing and puts very specific thought into it's placement/presentation specifically trying to cultivate an emotial response from it's audience. art.
games are not art. tic tack toe: not art. hopscotch: not art. hockey: not art.
video games are kind of a unique beast because it's a mix of game but also visual and audio media. i don't think anyone will even try to claim that tetris is art. but i think echochrome was very much trying to be art.
it comes down to intent: is the creator crafting the gameplay invoke some artistic vision or is the creator using using audio/visual to establish the rules of a game. there is, of course, a grey area.
nothing in what i said has any relationship to commericalability. a game can be very commerical, as can art.