vivster said:
Landguy said: Sony for sure. They have multiple divisions and almost all of them are troubled... |
Well Sony can at least lose the divisions that don't make any profit. Nintendo practically only has one division(if you go by their archaic stance that hardware and software belong together) so if that starts losing too much money it's over.
But the most important thing here is that none of those two will stop making consoles and games. If they go bancrupt there will be numerous investors standing by to keep up the business.
|
Archaic?
Did you know that the most valuable company on the planet is an integrated hardware/software vendor?
Did you know its largest software rivals are increasingly interested in becoming integrated hardware/software vendors?
Doesn't look to me like Nintendo is on the wrong side of history by staying integrated.
I'm not quite so convinced that investors will be lining up to buy console divisions, either. Lots of companies dream of using consoles as a trojan horse to take over the living room, but it hasn't happened yet. If fact it's a fickle market which has proven difficult to earn reliable profits in. The only reason MS isn't part of this discussion is because we all assume that they'll be willing to keep burning cash to stay in the game no matter what.
Meanwhile, the big screen in the living room is in very real danger of being conquered by a dozen smaller screens.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.