By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is Titanfall the game that Starhawk was supposed to be?

enditall727 on 06 February 2014

I cannot be the only person who thinks that Titanfall looks like Starhawk.

 

Take a look at these videos.

 

Am i the only person who can see the similarities between these two?



Around the Network
shloob on 06 February 2014

They are nothing alike. Starhawk was simply a new take on warhawk and was extremely mediocre at best.



fps_d0minat0r on 06 February 2014

the starhawks look much cooler.
The titans look like they were made from recycled garbage trucks.

thats just based on the videos above, havent played either.



binary solo on 06 February 2014

If they hadn't bothered with an absolutely terrible SP mode, which was essentially a glorified tutorial, all the more boring for those who played the beta, and actually focused on the MP, Starhawk would have been great. I really enjoyed the MP beta. But I never got into it when I bought the game because the SP was soooo disappointing.

But how is Starhawk like Titanfall, aside from the big robot you get to ride in?



“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."

Jimi Hendrix

 

jlmurph2 on 06 February 2014

Starhawk was mediocre at best, super laggy and showed why slapping on a campaign for a multiplayer based game is never good. For it to be called the "Best Multiplayer Experience on PS3" really showed how lacking the multiplayer scene was on PS3.



Around the Network
foodfather on 06 February 2014

I really enjoyed Starhawk for what it was. Favorite MP on PS3 for sure.



enditall727 on 06 February 2014
binary solo said:
If they hadn't bothered with an absolutely terrible SP mode, which was essentially a glorified tutorial, all the more boring for those who played the beta, and actually focused on the MP, Starhawk would have been great. I really enjoyed the MP beta. But I never got into it when I bought the game because the SP was soooo disappointing.

But how is Starhawk like Titanfall, aside from the big robot you get to ride in?


I can't really say..

 

Maybe it's the way you call shit out of the sky.. Idk

 

It seems like Titanfall has the budget that Starhawk might have needed



enditall727 on 06 February 2014
jlmurph2 said:
Starhawk was mediocre at best, super laggy and showed why slapping on a campaign for a multiplayer based game is never good. For it to be called the "Best Multiplayer Experience on PS3" really showed how lacking the multiplayer scene was on PS3.


He said "arguably" the best

 

And are you saying that the multiplayer was mediocre?



Kresnik on 06 February 2014

I spent months playing Starhawk.

The single player was a waste of time. The multi-player was sublime (and I didn't encounter any lag at all, let alone any "super lag"!)



Find my website here

Munkeh111 on 06 February 2014

Nope

Starhawk you call stuff from the sky to build things, not just for the Titan

Added to that, my favourite bits of StarHawk were the air combat and the large scale of the conflict in stark contrast to the small scale nature of Titanfall

Just a shame that they executed StarHawk so poorly. I know they didn't have a huge budget, but I found it really disappointing especially compared to Warhawk and even more disappointing compared to the original SP WarHawk that was cancelled