| deskpro2k3 said: Nah, people are not signing up to PS+ to play multi, because not all multiplay is behind a pay wall. They're signing up the free gaemz, and discounts! |
Lol, good one.
| deskpro2k3 said: Nah, people are not signing up to PS+ to play multi, because not all multiplay is behind a pay wall. They're signing up the free gaemz, and discounts! |
Lol, good one.
sales2099 said:
Thanks, I needed a laugh ;) Because PS Plus was really embraced on PS3. Seriously......welcome to the great world of paywalls and the cash it brings to our corporporate leaders! |
ugh....I'm still bitter that I had to get PS+ to play online for PS4. I love the free games and all, and I'll get to play games I either a. didn't plan on getting or b. just forgot about (DmC fell off my radar after it released), so I'm compensated for that $50 with more value than the $50 by itself would get. But the fact that I was essentially forced to get it (lest I pay full price to only get 50% of most games) just kinda irks me. But at least only the online MP is behind a paywall. If I was forced to get PS+ in order to, say, use an internet browser, I'd just get a WiiU

Good for Sony, but I still disagree on the means to achieve... Even tough it doesn't affect me because I have Plus for the games, but wouldn't buy it for Mp.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| NobleTeam360 said: I wish Vita sales would of tripled from the launch of the PS4. |
Sony didn't listen to me when I said to make Vita a mandatory bundle.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
BMaker11 said:
ugh....I'm still bitter that I had to get PS+ to play online for PS4. I love the free games and all, and I'll get to play games I either a. didn't plan on getting or b. just forgot about (DmC fell off my radar after it released), so I'm compensated for that $50 with more value than the $50 by itself would get. But the fact that I was essentially forced to get it (lest I pay full price to only get 50% of most games) just kinda irks me. But at least only the online MP is behind a paywall. If I was forced to get PS+ in order to, say, use an internet browser, I'd just get a WiiU |
thank goodness we don't need PSplus for netflix, and other subscription based services.

PS+ is an amazing service. Soon, almost all PS owners will subscribe.

This, I stole from grandpa...It's called soap.
The reason it tripled is because it was nearly half the price around the ps4 launch. I've purchased multiple codes at that time, do not own a PS4.
Kinda pisses me off how they brag about their PS+ numbers given that it is practically been forced on all PS4 gamers...
But yeah it was a good move by Sony for Sony.
| kabamarutr said: PS+ is an amazing service. Soon, almost all PS owners will subscribe. |
Well if you want to play MP on ps4 you dont really have a choice -_-
I wonder how many people bought PS+ voluntarily before PS4 came out. I did, couldn't resist the free games every month
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030