Machiavellian said:
Xenostar said:
Machiavellian said:
Xenostar said:
Machiavellian said:
FlamingWeazel said:
Uabit said: They are retarded. The problem is not the blu-ray drive. The problem is Kinect |
Yep ms really don't know what theya re doing, and sony will drop the price in 2015, they will still be in the same boat. If they are already thinking of a price drop and new model in the first year they did something wrong.
Why will anyone buy x1 now knowing a cheaper model is coming?
|
Do you know what a long stragety is. In other words without understanding MS long range plans for Kinect its silly to state Kinect is a problem. MS can easily get vendors parts cheaper and they can absorb the cost with a new revision of the unit just like Sony did with the PS3.
|
No Sony removed component after component on the PS3 to get price down initially, Bye Bye emotion engine, cya later usb ports, whos needs a memory card reader, metal front screw that make it plastic.
If MS want to get a cheaper product within year 1, id take a kinectless one over a driveless one any day.
|
Sony did both. The cut stuff and they also revised the hardware. Even with the slim they cut the price when they released the product which was a revision of the current hardware without any cut features. The X1 is Kinect and if MS is not willing to part with it then they must have big things in store for the device. So far there is no indication that MS is going a kinectless route.
|
I was talking about what they did year 1 in the panic to get the price down because no one was buying it, hardware revisions generally dont happen year 1 without drastic changes.
|
I understand where you are going but I am looking at the long term. I actually did not word that correctly. I do not mean hardware revisions but instead mean cheaper component prices. You can believe MS is in constant talks with hardware providers to get cost of materials lower. Usually that will go as profit back to MS if they can manufacture the hardware cheaper. Instead this will go to getting the console to that magic number of $300 a lot sooner than later because of the PS4.
|
Perhaps, but this doesn't change the fact that there is more potential to cut manufacturing costs in PS4 which is already cheaper, mainly due to GDDR5 which will drop in price more quickly as it spreads and production becomes more efficient and benefits from greater economy of scale, whereas with DDR3 this cost reduction has already occured to a large extent.
Additionally, MS's ability to barter with their suppliers may be limited by the contracts signed. Now I have no idea what the actually wording of these may be but it is perhaps possible that these don't allow for lowered prices beyond the usual drops like the Ram situation described above other than those agreed previously, which may limit MS's room for manoeuvre, though if someone more knowledgable can refute this then fair enough
In other words, to get to $300 first, MS would have to eat enormous losses which I doubt would be covered by other sources of revenue, and given that some on the board are already sceptical of Xbox's profitablility and whether or not its money should go elsewhere, that may not be possible