AMENDMENT (24/01): There appears to be a little bit of confusion of the framerates reported, and the fault is our own and our poor wording. We inaccurately used the term “average” when the math, in reality, does not add up. Logistically saying the average is ~30fps implies it exceeds and dips below 30fps, averaging at the number. That is not the case. What our sources have reported is that the listed FPS are roughly the most common targets during performance. So while the Xbox One version can reach ~45fps, for a majority of play it will sit around the ~30fps market, give a few frames. Same goes for the PlayStation 4 build, which in most cases hits around 60fps, take a few frames. Our sources have not confirmed exactly, but our own extrapolation of the information suggests you might say the average (accurate use of the term) Xbox One performance could be ~35fps, meanwhile the average PlayStation 4 performance may be ~55fps. Actual, concrete performance benchmarks will need to wait until the game is out for everyone, as we certainly don’t have them.

We apologise for any confusion from misuse of the term “average”, and hope this amendment better clarifies performance on both systems.

So we actually wont know until DF do their awesome tests.

But 10-15 fps difference between Xb1 and PS4 on their first game on average is really good news for Xbox One fans that care about Power as the most important thing. Looks as devs start to get on top of the different architecture on The One that they pull it much closer to PS4.

http://www.rocketchainsaw.com.au/exclusive-tomb-raider-definitive-edition-ps4xone-framerates-revealed/

I think that gives it away slightly lol.  You know damn well you'd need an attachment.

Dat spin:

What detailed analysis did you get this from?? they said ps4 stays at 60 nearly all the time, dropping a small amount of time happens iun eveyr game, i'd wait for Digital foundry before posting baseless numbers like this. Mopst likely it's mainly 60-30 it fluctuating sometimes doesn't make it suddenly only a 10-15 fps drop difference, doesn't work that way. Talk about spinning numbers.

You said we need to wait then proclaim 10-15 fps difference, real consistency in your arguments I see.

AMENDMENT (24/01): There appears to be a little bit of confusion of the framerates reported, and the fault is our own and our poor wording. We inaccurately used the term “average” when the math, in reality, does not add up. Logistically saying the average is ~30fps implies it exceeds and dips below 30fps, averaging at the number. That is not the case. What our sources have reported is that the listed FPS are roughly the most common targets during performance. So while the Xbox One version can reach ~45fps, for a majority of play it will sit around the ~30fps market, give a few frames. Same goes for the PlayStation 4 build, which in most cases hits around 60fps, take a few frames. Our sources have not confirmed exactly, but our own extrapolation of the information suggests you might say the average (accurate use of the term) Xbox One performance could be ~35fps, meanwhile the average PlayStation 4 performance may be ~55fps. Actual, concrete performance benchmarks will need to wait until the game is out for everyone, as we certainly don’t have them.

We apologise for any confusion from misuse of the term “average”, and hope this amendment better clarifies performance on both systems.

So we actually wont know until DF do their awesome tests.

But 10-15 fps difference between Xb1 and PS4 on their first game on average is really good news for Xbox One fans that care about Power as the most important thing. Looks as devs start to get on top of the different architecture on The One that they pull it much closer to PS4.

http://www.rocketchainsaw.com.au/exclusive-tomb-raider-definitive-edition-ps4xone-framerates-revealed/

Alright.  I respect the Xbox One owners who are fans of certain series that appear on Microsoft-only consoles.  I even see the point of view of those that feel bounded by their previous Gamerscore/Microsoft Points collection, no judgement here.  But I find it EXTREMELY irresponsible to sit on forums and argue the fact of multiplat specs differences are "close"/"marginal"/"not noticeable".  That's what you just did when you spinned this article into a "only 10-15fps difference"...*smh*

The propaganda from some of you Xbots are incredible.