By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bayonetta versus Bayonetta 2 comparison video

Tagged games:

bigtakilla on 01 January 2014
SubiyaCryolite said:
bigtakilla said:
SubiyaCryolite said:
bigtakilla said:
SubiyaCryolite said:
bigtakilla said:

Fast Racing Neo would disagree with you on the Wii U's ability of running games with 4k textures.


4K resolution, not 4K textures. The PS4 does Trine 2 at 4096 x 2960 at 30fps, 1920 x 1080 at 60fps. Wii U does Trine 2 at 30fps and in 720p like the 8-9 year old 7th gen systems and Im suppossed to be impressed? Seriously?

The games the Wii U runs at 1080p right now can run at 1080p on the PS3 and 360 as well. Case in point, Rayman Legends is 1080p60 on all 3 systems. Though if were still exclusive Nintendo fans would use that as "proof" its more powerful.

And while were on the subject of 4K textures, thats possible because of the extra RAM. A 360 with 1GB of RAM would support 4K textures as well. The reason I keep saying 360 + 512MB RAM is to highlight the fairly insignificant "power jump" beytween the two systems. Hardware on the level of a 9 year old system with extra (and slower) RAM and Graphic API extentions thrown on top is not impressive from a technical standpoint, its not. Games and gameplay aside the hardware is WEAK can we stop pretending otherwise.

Lol, the if and could argument. 

Id like to see you flatout deny that an XBox 360 with 1GB or RAM couldnt handle 4K textures.  Keep believing in a Wii U secret sauce all you want,the systems been out for about a year now and theres evidence about its real capabilities from both 1st and 3rd party games everywhere. Barely a month with the PS4 and One and we already see them doing things the 7th gen couldn't.


All the proof I need is that a 4k texture game will never appear on a last gen console. Seems like you're the one believing in the fairy-tales. 


Keep seeing what you want to see, including Pikmin 3 in 1080p XD

Okay, you keep believing in those "could be" 4k Xbox 360 textures. ;)



Around the Network
bigtakilla on 01 January 2014
Ryudo said:

B2 looks far better to me.

Also Youtube cannot show the game properly since it's very compressed and it moves so fast.

 

So some direct screenshots in the links. heck PG themselves said the guns on her feet more than 5k polys which is more than double that on B1.

 

 

Bayonetta 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bayonetta 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

BTW PG has confirmed it will run 1080p at 60FPS and people who playe dit at E3 said it was

Holy crap, this and the video really shows a pretty big leap. Thank for the pics.



bigtakilla on 01 January 2014
vivster said:
Asdrendeluxe said:
vivster said:
A moment of silence for how great this game could've looked on PS4.


A moment of silence for how it will look without Nintendo. Ohhhh it will not happen oh shit.

At least that black screen on my tv would've been 1080p :P

...

Also, did I blame anyone in my first post? I'm well aware about the circumstances around Bayonetta 2.

Good news, you still got that black screen!



bigtakilla on 01 January 2014
Darc Requiem said:
They should have used the 360 version. Bayonetta 2 looks better than the Bayonetta 1 on 360 as well. Using the PS3 version was bush league.


Make a video of that then, show us.



S.T.A.G.E. on 01 January 2014
vivster said:
A moment of silence for how great this game could've looked on PS4.


LOL. Im dead right now, thats so trueeee! LOL!

 Bayonetta 2: A little past last gen but glossier. ;)



Around the Network
bigtakilla on 01 January 2014
S.T.A.G.E. said:
vivster said:
A moment of silence for how great this game could've looked on PS4.


LOL. Im dead right now, thats so trueeee! LOL!

 Bayonetta 2: The little past last gen but glossier. ;)


Now with more tears!!!! 



Samus Aran on 01 January 2014
Torillian said:
Samus Aran said:


That's ok, I still like you. :p

If Sony just made some exclusive games for the Vita I would have a reason to buy one. But that's my opinion of course. 


Sigh.....you obviously haven't looked into it whatsoever and yet you want to make judgement calls about the Vita not having any reason to exist.  Your opinion is an uninformed pile of crap that hurts to read.  If you want such things to be taken seriously at least make an attempt to research things before making such wild claims.  


Funny how a lot of you guys have been jumping on me for attacking the Vita while never answering my question. What exclusive games does the Vita have? I don't care for inferior ports. I can get a cheap PS3 for that. 

If Vita wants to be taken seriously it needs to have good games that aren't playable on another gaming console. 

3DS has Pokémon X/Y, Zelda: ALBW, Fire Emblem: Awakening, Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon, Super Mario 3D Land, Animal Crossing, Mario Kart: 7, etc



Torillian on 01 January 2014
Samus Aran said:
Torillian said:
Samus Aran said:


That's ok, I still like you. :p

If Sony just made some exclusive games for the Vita I would have a reason to buy one. But that's my opinion of course. 


Sigh.....you obviously haven't looked into it whatsoever and yet you want to make judgement calls about the Vita not having any reason to exist.  Your opinion is an uninformed pile of crap that hurts to read.  If you want such things to be taken seriously at least make an attempt to research things before making such wild claims.  


Funny how a lot of you guys have been jumping on me for attacking the Vita while never answering my question. What exclusive games does the Vita have? I don't care for inferior ports. I can get a cheap PS3 for that. 

If Vita wants to be taken seriously it needs to have good games that aren't playable on another gaming console. 

3DS has Pokémon X/Y, Zelda: ALBW, Fire Emblem: Awakening, Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon, Super Mario 3D Land, Animal Crossing, Mario Kart: 7, etc

Noone is saying that the 3DS doesn't have more, it obviously does, but acting as though the Vita doesn't have Uncharted, LBP, Tearaway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, and Gravity Rush all with meta over 80 and saying the only thing it has worthwhile is Persona 4 G is a vast oversimplification because you've never actually looked at what the platform has.  



...

Samus Aran on 01 January 2014
Torillian said:
Samus Aran said:
Torillian said:
Samus Aran said:


That's ok, I still like you. :p

If Sony just made some exclusive games for the Vita I would have a reason to buy one. But that's my opinion of course. 


Sigh.....you obviously haven't looked into it whatsoever and yet you want to make judgement calls about the Vita not having any reason to exist.  Your opinion is an uninformed pile of crap that hurts to read.  If you want such things to be taken seriously at least make an attempt to research things before making such wild claims.  


Funny how a lot of you guys have been jumping on me for attacking the Vita while never answering my question. What exclusive games does the Vita have? I don't care for inferior ports. I can get a cheap PS3 for that. 

If Vita wants to be taken seriously it needs to have good games that aren't playable on another gaming console. 

3DS has Pokémon X/Y, Zelda: ALBW, Fire Emblem: Awakening, Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon, Super Mario 3D Land, Animal Crossing, Mario Kart: 7, etc

Noone is saying that the 3DS doesn't have more, it obviously does, but acting as though the Vita doesn't have Uncharted, LBP, Tearaway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, and Gravity Rush all with meta over 80 and saying the only thing it has worthwhile is Persona 4 G is a vast oversimplification because you've never actually looked at what the platform has.  


I've played that Uncharted game and it was pretty boring. 



RazorDragon on 01 January 2014
SubiyaCryolite said:
bigtakilla said:
SubiyaCryolite said:
bigtakilla said:

Fast Racing Neo would disagree with you on the Wii U's ability of running games with 4k textures.


4K resolution, not 4K textures. The PS4 does Trine 2 at 4096 x 2960 at 30fps, 1920 x 1080 at 60fps. Wii U does Trine 2 at 30fps and in 720p like the 8-9 year old 7th gen systems and Im suppossed to be impressed? Seriously?

The games the Wii U runs at 1080p right now can run at 1080p on the PS3 and 360 as well. Case in point, Rayman Legends is 1080p60 on all 3 systems. Though if were still exclusive Nintendo fans would use that as "proof" its more powerful.

And while were on the subject of 4K textures, thats possible because of the extra RAM. A 360 with 1GB of RAM would support 4K textures as well. The reason I keep saying 360 + 512MB RAM is to highlight the fairly insignificant "power jump" beytween the two systems. Hardware on the level of a 9 year old system with extra (and slower) RAM and Graphic API extentions thrown on top is not impressive from a technical standpoint, its not. Games and gameplay aside the hardware is WEAK can we stop pretending otherwise.

Lol, the if and could argument. 

Id like to see you flatout deny that an XBox 360 with 1GB or RAM couldnt handle 4K textures.  Keep believing in a Wii U secret sauce all you want,the systems been out for about a year now and theres evidence about its real capabilities from both 1st and 3rd party games everywhere. Barely a month with the PS4 and One and we already see them doing things the 7th gen couldn't.


Sure, man. More RAM is everything you need to do high res textures in a game. I'm quite sure if you put a Voodoo 2 GPU with 1GB VRAM it would run all games available with the same texture quality as the Wii U, right? That's why a 2GB GT 610 GPU, for example, can run games with better texture resolution than a 1GB GTX 650 can.

PS: I'm joking.