By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is PS4 CPU is better than Xbone CPU?

alabtrosMyster on 20 December 2013


You are embarassing yourself, you can say that Ryse is beautiful, like the last of us, uncharted 3 or some other existing games on ps360, ps2, original xbox, psx, sega saturn, snes, genesis, nes... etc.

However, Ryse, no matter how good it looks, can hold a candle to Killzone:SF graphics wise, killzone has some of the best texture and lighting work available on ANY platform, Crysis 3 running on a top of the line PC is the closest game currently available! (now if your PC has the spects to run it at a decent frame rate good for you...)

Still, for some reason Ryse on XB1 runs at both a lower resolution and has frame rate drops way below 30fps! while KZ:SF has a frame rate that hovers between 40 - 50 fps in single player... and close to 60 in multiplayer...

Add to this the consistant higs image quality of EVERY single PS4 released so far, even the xb1 games that run at 1080p.. they usually sacrifice AA or lighting quality (I look at you Forza 5) ... they may look good, but state of the art they are not.



Around the Network
NYCrysis on 20 December 2013
tuscaniman99 said:
NYCrysis said:
selnor1983 said:

I need proof. So far Ryse blew me and others away. Killzone didnt really do that. Maybe I should have played KZ first.

I fully expect 343i and Halo 5 to blow KZ away visually. And show us just how amazing a shooter with an open battlefield can look. 343i are gonna make Halo 5 look absolutely astounding. Especially considering what they achieved with Halo 4 on Xbox 360.


First of all there is nothing on xb1 that looks and is technically as good as infamous 2nd son. The physics, particle effects, animations, open world game play, lighting all look unrivaled and destroys anything coming on xb1. Add to the fact that it's a near launch title, I don't think xb1 can catch up ever.

2nd of all regarding halo and 343i; the person who made halo as graphically as good on 360 now works for naughty dog and even before her naughty dog was unrivaled in the console graphics category good luck to Halo ONE trying to get even close to Uncharted 4.

Also quantic dream's (ps exclusive dev) animations destroy anything shown on xbox. Beyond 2 souls animations are unrivaled. QD's PS4 e3 demo is also unrivaled. Nothing compared to it on xb1.

Infamous isn't out yet so how do you know?


Gameplay footage, screenshots, recent dev talk and offscreen footage. 



Gremdude on 20 December 2013
selnor1983 said:
Noone cares anymore. The games are out and the OS are being used.

So far

Xbox One has the best graphics at launch and is the only console that can do true multitasking and snapping.

So far.


Uh no. 720p is not best graphics. So far.



superchunk on 20 December 2013

Same CPU. One may be turned up a bit more, but they can't be "better" as they are the identical CPU.



selnor1983 on 20 December 2013
NYCrysis said:
selnor1983 said:

You found the list of devs. Cheers, I forgot the people form Kojima Productions, Guirella Games etc to. ROFL. Cheers brah. Oh and Industrial Light and Magic ( yes thats right mate ) and Santa Monica Studios on top of Bethesda, Crytek and Naughty Dog. Not looking good for your Corrine oh corrine.

 

Corrine ROFL. hahahahahahahahahah

I am missing the words naughty dog, epic, and crytek in the list of developers I posted. Good job at the straight up lying that you are doing now. Also besides id devs none of the devs from the former studios have anything to do with graphics. Isn't that what we are discussing or have we changed the topic to fit your agenda?

Also corrine at 343

Corrinne Yu - Principal Engine Programmer on Halo 4 

She had the biggest hand in halo's graphics. It's cause of her halo 4 looked as good as it did. MS even applied a patent for her lighting algorithm. 

Keep on laughing. I will be the one to laugh when I quote this thread when halo 5/Uncharted 4 come out and uncharted mauls halo 5 in the graphics department.

Since when did I mention Uncharted 4???

I thought you were saying linear games cant be compared to big open battlefields? Hence why I said Halo 5 will blow Shadowfall away. You keep moving te goalposts to fit what your saying.

Good thing orrine is finally associated with a game  that won some graphics  awards. Only took her to be paired with great developers to do so.

Hey I just tried Brothers in Arms Hells Highway. Shes a genius. Best graphics ever.



Around the Network
selnor1983 on 20 December 2013
Gremdude said:
selnor1983 said:
Noone cares anymore. The games are out and the OS are being used.

So far

Xbox One has the best graphics at launch and is the only console that can do true multitasking and snapping.

So far.


Uh no. 720p is not best graphics. So far.

720p???

Ryse is 900p.

Graphics are more than resolution. Otherwise TLOU is nowhere best visuals as it was 720p. That means GT5 destroys it.



Sal.Paradise on 20 December 2013
superchunk said:
Same CPU. One may be turned up a bit more, but they can't be "better" as they are the identical CPU.

But they aren't identical if one gives better performance. 

edit - unless there's something in the XB1 architecture bottlenecking it that isn't in PS4's 



Hynad on 20 December 2013
kappie1977 said:
selnor1983 said:

Oh you mean where the developers have clearly stated its to do with the SDK not being nearly as finalised as Sony's? Nothing to do with the hardware.

Crytek clearly showing whats possible even with poor SDK. After playing alot of Ryse, seeing Killzone after shows low res textures, badly animated characters, less enemies onscreen and less effects. In fact the city scape was the only real impressive thing in Killzone. The close in stuff looked pretty low res. Well in comparison to Ryse. And Ryse has a couple of levels with huge draw distance also. Showing it has a massive scale to.

But hey its all opinion bruv so..... I guess we should leave it. :)

Offtopic: All your responses etc are really biased. I think we need to start a forum topic to make a choice in voting you for King Xbox!

Come on now. He can't be anything other than the King XBox's jester. xD



superchunk on 20 December 2013
Sal.Paradise said:
superchunk said:
Same CPU. One may be turned up a bit more, but they can't be "better" as they are the identical CPU.

But they aren't identical if one gives better performance. 

edit - unless there's something in the XB1 architecture bottlenecking it that isn't in PS4's 

They are the same. One is just faster.

They are literally the same chip, however MS has overclocked it a bit.

Thus one is not "better", just overclocked.

 

If we both go to new egg and buy the same i7 CPU, neither one of us has a "better" CPU. We bought the same exact model. But one of us could overclock it to allow it to run slightly faster... and hotter and potentially break faster, etc.

 

 

EDIT: plus there's alot more to it than just the CPU. There are other variables that could be affecting this test. People are being too narrow minded.

On top of all of that, it really doesn't matter as the GPU is the work horse now and PS4's GPU is definitely a better GPU in multiple ways.



Sal.Paradise on 20 December 2013
superchunk said:
Sal.Paradise said:
superchunk said:
Same CPU. One may be turned up a bit more, but they can't be "better" as they are the identical CPU.

But they aren't identical if one gives better performance. 

edit - unless there's something in the XB1 architecture bottlenecking it that isn't in PS4's 

They are the same. One is just faster.

They are literally the same chip, however MS has overclocked it a bit.

Thus one is not "better", just overclocked.

 

If we both go to new egg and buy the same i7 CPU, neither one of us has a "better" CPU. We bought the same exact model. But one of us could overclock it to allow it to run slightly faster... and hotter and potentially break faster, etc.

Of course they're different. One is overclocked and thus performs better than the other. They are the same model, yes, but with different capabilities. They are, literally, not identical - one runs at a higher clock frequency with probably different voltage consumption. Don't need weird newegg analogies to tell us that. And as long as the overclock is stable, one can definitely be considered 'better' than the other.