kabamarutr said:
Well, yes. It's lower. It must be, given all the data so far. Then again, I don't see why the fuss. I guess you want to get even with some people, but consider the fact that such actions set the foundations for subsequent counter-actions. A vicious circle of being hit and retaliating.
I have no right whatsoever to advise you on anything and please forgive me if it seems insulting or anything to you. I saw you earlier calling people to "man up". I'll say, be the better man and let them enjoy their flop, such as it is. Construct, thusly, a paradigm that they, themselves should follow on future occasions.
|
this works both way's if there wants to call it data = flop vs the previous game was released in the same generation cycle, and the next game does not match up, than that maust be some gamer's perception of what a Flop is, thus if they want to call it a flop , so be it but every game than needs to held under the same standard's than, that would make 1 week data to determine all software by 1st week if its a flop or not, than if thats the way some gamer's want to call it how about all games than? that way only one week of tracking data would be needed for every game for how well its done, sounds good to me. I can live with that. I say lets do it.
LMAO
Look at it this way , many could get away with saying and rubbing in that every game on the PSVita is a flop.
Would people trade bragging rights for software only be tracked by only 7 days of data only ?
I would. bring it on..LMAO

I AM BOLO
100% lover "nothing else matter's" after that...
ps:
Proud psOne/2/3/p owner. I survived Aplcalyps3 and all I got was this lousy Signature.