By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Prediction: One Year From Now Nintendo Will Still Have All Top Rated Next Gen Exclusives

KingdomHeartsFan said:
kitler53 said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
What are the current top 4? Are we including handhelds?

1. SM3DW

2. WW HD

3. Pikmin 3

4. NSMBU


if re-releases count then flower already destroyed your prediction.

Flower is a straight port, WW HD actually has significant changes, not only to its visuals but added content.

lol.   sorry bro but you just made this whole thing laughable.  wind waker is on gamecube then released on wiiU with visual upgrades but then you go on to dismiss flower which also got a visual upgrade.  SSB is on 3DS and you brought it up in the OP as a "guarenteed top rated exclusive" but then you go on to dismiss titanfall as not exclusive.

rationalize things however you want but you've already failed.  you've already had to bend the rules to try and make your argument and your thread is a joke.



Around the Network
orniletter said:
Fusioncode said:
orniletter said:
Fusioncode said:
orniletter said:


You think that Infamous Second Son will have a 90+ meta score ? (Wind Waker HD sits at 90)

 

Wind Waker HD is a port. Why would it get glowing review scores? 

It isn´t a port and it already has gotten a 90 meta score.

Yes it is. Resident Evil on Gamecube was a remake. Metal Gear Solid The Twin Snakes was a remake. Wind Waker HD is a port. 

Wind Waker blurrs the line between HD port and Remake.

There is to much changed to consider it a port and not enough to call it a full on remake.

I think a remake should be a complete overhaul of the original. I don't think an HD upgrade, a few new items, and an extra difficulty mode should count. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Infamous Second Son
The Order
Uncharted
Halo 5
Quantum Break
Titanfall



kitler53 said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

Flower is a straight port, WW HD actually has significant changes, not only to its visuals but added content.

lol.   sorry bro but you just made this whole thing laughable.  wind waker is on gamecube then released on wiiU with visual upgrades but then you go on to dismiss flower which also got a visual upgrade.  SSB is on 3DS and you brought it up in the OP as a "guarenteed top rated exclusive" but then you go on to dismiss titanfall as not exclusive.

rationalize things however you want but you've already failed.  you've already had to bend the rules to try and make your argument and your thread is a joke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOPAaMXbdW8

Oh ya look at those visual upgrades lol...This is completely comparable to WW's difference.



Only around here would people consider an 80 or 90 "not that great." ..LOL

I have no clue why so many of you seem anti-Nintendo. And an "instant" 10 on Titanfall from EVERYONE? Really?



Try to do at least ONE good deed everyday....

Around the Network
KingdomHeartsFan said:
kitler53 said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

Flower is a straight port, WW HD actually has significant changes, not only to its visuals but added content.

lol.   sorry bro but you just made this whole thing laughable.  wind waker is on gamecube then released on wiiU with visual upgrades but then you go on to dismiss flower which also got a visual upgrade.  SSB is on 3DS and you brought it up in the OP as a "guarenteed top rated exclusive" but then you go on to dismiss titanfall as not exclusive.

rationalize things however you want but you've already failed.  you've already had to bend the rules to try and make your argument and your thread is a joke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOPAaMXbdW8

Oh ya look at those visual upgrades lol...This is completely comparable to WW's difference.

...and yet, i've played WW long before wiiU was even a twinkle in nintendo's eye.   fuck,  why bother even listing NSMBU on your list.  DeusEx directors cut and Mass effect 3 special edition both scored better and are "exclusive".    right?  riiiight...



Fusioncode said:

I think a remake should be a complete overhaul of the original. I don't think an HD upgrade, a few new items, and an extra difficulty mode should count. 


There is far more changed than you think (I get it you haven´t played it )

The grand majority of textures was redone, they threw the old lighting system out the window... they changed more than any other HD remake I could think of.

 

Again, it isn´t a full on Remake, but calling it a port is doing it a disservice.



Boutros said:
But what about all the third-party games that won't be on the Wii U?

People constantly think it's a fight of first-party exclusives with Nintendo but in reality their biggest obstacle is the lack of third-party support, not the competition from Microsoft and Sony's first party studios.


^This. 

It's impressive that Nintendo keeps making these critically acclaimed titles, but they don't get that many critically acclaimed 3rd party games.



kitler53 said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOPAaMXbdW8

Oh ya look at those visual upgrades lol...This is completely comparable to WW's difference.

...and yet, i've played WW long before wiiU was even a twinkle in nintendo's eye.   fuck,  why bother even listing NSMBU on your list.  DeusEx directors cut and Mass effect 3 special edition both scored better and are "exclusive".    right?  riiiight...

Lol so WW HD is the same as including the exact same game on another console with the DLC included, which was already available on that other console...its clear we have different definitions of what a port is.



gcube2000 said:
idk they might still have at least the top 4 but i think sony or microsoft will have at least one exclusive thats near the top


They already do, resogun is just 1 point behind SMB2