So 2.1 million in 32 countries is impressive? Yet numerous people were taking shots at MS when they did 1.2 in 24/48 hrs in 13, which if reports turn out to be true maybe around 1.7 to 1.9 in 13 countries in a week shorter to date,is somehow MS getting crushed as I've seen some say. Looks like MS is actually doing better in the broad scope of things. and this is good all around for everyone, except maybe Nintendo......

Lol at taking the number of countries as apple to apples.  US and UK >>> the other 30 and 12 respectively combined.   But please tell yourself what you need to hear.

So 2.1 million in 32 countries is impressive? Yet numerous people were taking shots at MS when they did 1.2 in 24/48 hrs in 13, which if reports turn out to be true maybe around 1.7 to 1.9 in 13 countries in a week shorter to date,is somehow MS getting crushed as I've seen some say. Looks like MS is actually doing better in the broad scope of things. and this is good all around for everyone, except maybe Nintendo. I hope they both sell well way into the future. We all benefit no matter our console of choice. As gamers all systems should be embraced. It's competition and that's what makes people strive to innovate and create better games, consoles, interfaces, everything. and No this is not impressive for either console, It was expected. Impressive would have been 5 million for either one. but supply is what is limiting sales.

SO 2.1 in 32 is better then 1.7 /1.9 in 13? Please explain. If i sell 50 apples to people in 32 states and my competitor sells 40 apples in 13 states. He is doing better than me. Plain and simple. I will still sleep fine tonight if sony sells 50 million overnight or if MS sells 50 million overnight. but to give praise to one for doing 1 million in 2 countries and then when MS does 1.2 in 13 countries say, yea but...it took 13 countries, sony did it in 2 is laughable. same logic appliesto this. It took sony 32 to hit 2 million when MS has almost got 2 million in only 13. Their will be no way of knowing who is doing better overall til the countries released in are equal. and yes everyone knows sony will dominate in japan.

You mean the numbers given by Sony?

The mediocre data based on 3,000 purchases.

SO 2.1 in 32 is better then 1.7 /1.9 in 13? Please explain. If i sell 50 apples to people in 32 states and my competitor sells 40 apples in 13 states. He is doing better than me. Plain and simple. I will still sleep fine tonight if sony sells 50 million overnight or if MS sells 50 million overnight. but to give praise to one for doing 1 million in 2 countries and then when MS does 1.2 in 13 countries say, yea but...it took 13 countries, sony did it in 2 is laughable. same logic appliesto this. It took sony 32 to hit 2 million when MS has almost got 2 million in only 13. Their will be no way of knowing who is doing better overall til the countries released in are equal. and yes everyone knows sony will dominate in japan.

SO 2.1 in 32 is better then 1.7 /1.9 in 13? Please explain. If i sell 50 apples to people in 32 states and my competitor sells 40 apples in 13 states. He is doing better than me. Plain and simple. I will still sleep fine tonight if sony sells 50 million overnight or if MS sells 50 million overnight. but to give praise to one for doing 1 million in 2 countries and then when MS does 1.2 in 13 countries say, yea but...it took 13 countries, sony did it in 2 is laughable. same logic appliesto this. It took sony 32 to hit 2 million when MS has almost got 2 million in only 13. Their will be no way of knowing who is doing better overall til the countries released in are equal. and yes everyone knows sony will dominate in japan.