thx1139 said:
So you 100% answered the way I wanted you to. It was never about the capabilities. The iPhone wasnt a better phone. It was a crappy phone. It was the interface. Lets face it the PS4 and Smart TVs interfaces are crap. MS is going the exact same route that Apple took with the iPhone. They are building the better interface. The Windows Mobile phone I had when the iPhone came out did everything the iPhone did and I could put apps and build apps for it. Back then you couldnt even do that with the iPhone. It was the interface that mattered. |
You are comparing two very different devices, the interface on iphone matters because it was practical. Tell me which part of x1's interface do you see becoming its selling point worth $500? The voice command? Skype call? NFL deal? Do you really think people will cash out $500 so that they can favourite, switch channels, volume up volume down using kinect? Or use a skype call on their TV while skype functionality is literally on every smart device available?
I'm not bashing, just an honest question. Iphone took off because it has this cool factor, it puts appstore, music collection, book collection, mobile gaming, all into one device and hell it was practical. Every innovation sounds good on paper, but for it to take off, people actually have to use it, it has to be applicable, it has to be natural, not just be a gimmick.
Edit: Some people do not just want a device that's jack of all trade and master of none. The correct way to implement all those additional feature is to do so without any compromise, lets be realistic, x1 is still a gaming machine for most of its audiences and it does multi-media, giving up gaming performance.
Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz
XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory
Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz