By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - The guy behind Star Citizen is a complete dick imo

Mad55 said:
RenCutypoison said:
Th3PANO said:
another indy who thinks he owns the world after one hit....nothing new here


Andy warhol ... Andy warhols everywhere ! =O

Looks like indies are the new arrogant pop artist. At least some of their games are good.

Yea hes a dick.......whats in yo signature breh.

Jinx from LoL



Around the Network
RenCutypoison said:
Mad55 said:
RenCutypoison said:
Th3PANO said:
another indy who thinks he owns the world after one hit....nothing new here


Andy warhol ... Andy warhols everywhere ! =O

Looks like indies are the new arrogant pop artist. At least some of their games are good.

Yea hes a dick.......whats in yo signature breh.

Jinx from LoL

Oh okay gifs are pretty cool. 



Zkuq said:
Akvod said:

And someone who finds QC unnecessary is someone who thinks they're flawless.

Nice generalization there. Devs do QC themselves, and the extra QC by console companies is an extra hindrance for many. And does it even work all that well? I bet you Skyrim didn't see enough QC on any platform...


So you think that it's unnecessary/unreasonable for a console maker to want some basic QC before a product rolls out to a platform composed of tens of millions of owners? To check if the thing is at least functioning?



theyre always fiesty like that at the beginning.
in the end though once they had enough of clowning around and decide they want to stay in the industry, they come to the consoles.

its great they are designing it for high end PC's but why act like a douche in front of the mass market who will be funding them? the folk with dual titans and 4k monitors will barely fund the petrol in his car and his morning coffee...and hes already got their money through kickstarter.

the trailer looks like it was ripped from starwars attack of the clones anyway.



Akvod said:
Zkuq said:
Akvod said:

And someone who finds QC unnecessary is someone who thinks they're flawless.

Nice generalization there. Devs do QC themselves, and the extra QC by console companies is an extra hindrance for many. And does it even work all that well? I bet you Skyrim didn't see enough QC on any platform...

So you think that it's unnecessary/unreasonable for a console maker to want some basic QC before a product rolls out to a platform composed of tens of millions of owners? To check if the thing is at least functioning?

No, certainly not. But heavy QC processes for patches are just ridiculous when they don't work very well even for whole games.