JoeTheBro said:
|
4% of 1M is 40,000 units.
but yeah 0.04% is 400 units.
How would you rate the launch lineup? | |||
Good | 51 | 20.90% | |
Bad | 73 | 29.92% | |
Decent | 101 | 41.39% | |
See Results | 19 | 7.79% | |
Total: | 244 |
JoeTheBro said:
|
4% of 1M is 40,000 units.
but yeah 0.04% is 400 units.
Wagram said:
4% of 1M is 40,000 units. but yeah 0.04% is 400 units. |
It's 0,4% actually. So 4000 units.
I voted good. I picked up BF4, AC4, and Shadow Fall. Also got Resogun and Contrast free with PS+ and War Frame is a pretty cool game. Just because it's not packed with 1st party games doesn't mean it sucks.
Lets be honest this launch lineup is pretty terrible which consists of last gen games and mediocre titles, that's why i chose to pass on getting a launch console this go around. Nothing against the PS4 because i will be picking one up in 2014 when a few games have hit the market (hopefully a limited edition :D) but until then ill pass the time by catching up my backlog from past gens. To all you early adopters though congrats on being us patient people's test dummies :D haha! lol
Somini said:
It's 0,4% actually. So 4000 units. |
Apparently we all suck at math.
I'm done with it...
Bought KZ, Knack, and Resogun.
Resogun rocks. Killzone was decent but not as good as previous KZs. And Knack is fun at first but gets boring quick.
Skipped the PC ported indies because I already have them as PC games.
Skipped the multi-platform games because I am getting them on X1.
outlawauron said:
Be specific. |
I think Battlefield, Killzone, Assassin's Creed and pretty well every big name game in the launch line up is over rated. Not just for PS4, but in general I feel high budget games never get the scores they really deserve because they fund gaming websites with ads.
Need for Speed especially, no NFS game deserves a score above 75/100, except maybe the original Most Wanted.
I feel Knack got the only honest score, and that's a 60.
----
So why I say PS4 is average is because there is no gem in the lineup. N64 for instance only had 2-3 games in the launch lineup, but Super Mario 64 was a game people bought up until the console died, it was awesome. Twilight Princess for Wii was much the same, and I gave other examples above.
A launch is suppose to have at least 1 game which justifies why someone developed a console. Killzone and 7/8th gen multiplats don't do this, they just give you reason to play a game in 1080p. Wii Sports and Super Mario 64 on the other hand, justified a new console, you could not play a game like that in any way on the Gamecube/SNES.
What is with all the hate? Don't read GamrReview Articles. Contact me to ADD games to the Database
Vote for the March Most Wanted / February Results
Never played any of the exclusive probably never will. the line up is ight thanks to the fact that multi plats have taken over the industry. I think it's sad that the best game of the "next gen" happens to be a space invaders upgrade.......
http://imageshack.com/a/img801/6426/f7pc.gif
^Yes that's me ripping it up in the GIF. :)
Lol yeah fundamental math error on my part, haha and there's no way there are 40,000 failed units baha I'm just gonna go to sleep now.
Michael-5 said:
I think Battlefield, Killzone, Assassin's Creed and pretty well every big name game in the launch line up is over rated. Not just for PS4, but in general I feel high budget games never get the scores they really deserve because they fund gaming websites with ads. Need for Speed especially, no NFS game deserves a score above 75/100, except maybe the original Most Wanted. I feel Knack got the only honest score, and that's a 60. |
Have you played BF4, KZ: Shadow Fall, AC4, or NFS Rivals on PS4?
And there's no way in hell Knack is a 60. At least, not based on where I am in the game.