It will go back to 75 shortly.

No need to change the thread title yet...

You might want to update the thread title.

It's now a 73. Still a few reviews though. Even Dead Rising 3 has more reviews than this and that game hasn't even launched yet.

Actually it went down again (73). Pre order Canceled :P

Single is quite good, a few headaces like skydiving or space seat thing.

Its quite fun gunning down the helghast. Its more stealth strategy shooter, you got to use the uav smartly to your benefit. And you cant run and gun as you get lit up.

Multi is rock solid.

Game should be an easy around a 8.5 given its clear strengths and its weaknesses are inherent in most fps games.

This game has seriously a problem with the professionnal reviewer. Because it has almost 7.9 from user score when COD has 7.9 from critics but 2.8 from user score.

Similar with BF4, 8.7 pro VS 7.0 users.

Basing of my experience, I found the user critic on metacritic more reliable than the pro critic. And when you look the bad critics for KZ, it is mostly freshly new suspicious accounts who just give 0.

For instance with resogun: 8.2 VS 8.5 users, every normal who played it adored it.

Pathetic. Because from real gamer everythere (and lots of reviews also) they give really positive feedback.
What's wrong with those reviewers? Because every games I played I always more agreed with the metacritic user score than the pro reviewers? And this on both sides.

It must be a proof that a lot of reviewers are really biased because of money or contacts friends with Microsoft or Sony. Not necessarily money links but just friend with Microsoft or Sony or Microsoft exec etc.

Oh yes I am gonna change the thread title. You won't be disappointed.

That's it.

user scores are not a reliable source for reviews. Many put on negative reviews just to pull down the scores of games, at the same time many also put glowing reviews just to pull the scores up. And most of them haven't even played the game/or are just trolling.

Lol @ the Toronto mail review, The reviewer sounds like a poor gamer who wants someone to hold his hand like COD does. Critics...

And then you have people saying. "Who cares? Just enjoy the game, dude". Well, I kind of do care. If a game doesn't do well because of reviwers, it might not get a sequel or a good budget for a sequel (or even a different/inferior developing team). 

In my experience, they are more reliable than pro reviewers based roughly on the games I have played.

Anyway, do you think 29 scores is reliable? Don't you prefer 387 users, even if 10% are trolls, they are trolls of both sides. And anyway I haven't seen a real genuine personnal review on Internet less than 7/10.

For instance the guy from USgamer who gave a shitty article on "you don't need a PS4" or something on Eurogamer said on the comments that he would have score KZSF a 7/10. When his then co-worker on USgamer scored the game 4/10. You see, a pro-reviewer give 4/10 when a guy who wrote a wholly negative article on PS4 on Eurogamer admitted that he would have score 7/10. Maybe that's why USgamer didn't ask him to review the game.

Or when Polygon ask specifically Arthur Gies to review a game from the serie everybody in the world knows he hate. Were they supposing that he would give a fair review when he hates FPS and particularly Killzone? But then Knack is reviewed by another reviewer and scored higher than KZ?

I could go on and go on but I am starting to really lose confidence on pro-reviewers. It was the same sort of stuff with ZombiU with the bad gamespot score and it finally reach 77 on metacritic, then a good/great game. But the first reviews were really mixed, too much mixed.