This game has seriously a problem with the professionnal reviewer. Because it has almost 7.9 from user score when COD has 7.9 from critics but 2.8 from user score.
Similar with BF4, 8.7 pro VS 7.0 users.
Basing of my experience, I found the user critic on metacritic more reliable than the pro critic. And when you look the bad critics for KZ, it is mostly freshly new suspicious accounts who just give 0.
For instance with resogun: 8.2 VS 8.5 users, every normal who played it adored it.
Pathetic. Because from real gamer everythere (and lots of reviews also) they give really positive feedback.
What's wrong with those reviewers? Because every games I played I always more agreed with the metacritic user score than the pro reviewers? And this on both sides.
It must be a proof that a lot of reviewers are really biased because of money or contacts friends with Microsoft or Sony. Not necessarily money links but just friend with Microsoft or Sony or Microsoft exec etc.
Oh yes I am gonna change the thread title. You won't be disappointed.
That's it.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
