By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Injustice: Gods Among Us Ultimate Edition Coming To PS4/PS3/PSV/360/PC

kitler53 on 07 October 2013
Darc Requiem said:
Scisca said:
...


Or maybe instead of putting all the blame on 3rd parties put a chunk of it on Nintendo for not being able to sell its console and make it a viable product? It's foolish to think that 3rd parties don't care to give you DLCs just cause it's Nitnedo. DLC is moneygrab either way - nobody can deny it, especially with a game like this. But if a game sells 60k copies, there is no money to grab, because just how many people will buy this DLC? 1k? There is no way this would make up for the costs of producing the DLC, so why should 3rd parties bother? They are not charities. I mean, NFS:MW sold 400k on Vita and that still wasn't enough to give us those few additional cars. And while I'd love to get these cars as I really enjoy the game and feel bad about EA for ignoring us (X360 version sold 1.14 mil and they got the DLCs...), we have to be aware that as long as our favourite platforms (PSV and Wii U) keep on struggling, we have to enjoy what we get. Sad but true.

 

Is this Injustice game any good? How does it compare to MK Vita or the Street Fighter game on Vita? If I'm not really that much into fighters, would I enjoy it? Is the platinum hard to get? ;)


So let me get this straight, It's Nintendo's fault that I have to go multiple stores to find a 3rd party game that is readily available from that same 3rd Party developer on competing platforms. Who ever you blame for Nintendo's third party woes, once a publisher decides to put a game on platform. It's there responsiblity to make sure the game is actually available for purchase. It is also that publisher's responsibility to make DLC available. You want to blame Nintendo for not getting more third party titles on their platforms? By all means, but at some point publisher has to have some modicum of responsibility. 


so whom should i blame for the wonderful 101?..



Around the Network
Mr Khan on 08 October 2013
kitler53 said:
Darc Requiem said:
Scisca said:
...


Or maybe instead of putting all the blame on 3rd parties put a chunk of it on Nintendo for not being able to sell its console and make it a viable product? It's foolish to think that 3rd parties don't care to give you DLCs just cause it's Nitnedo. DLC is moneygrab either way - nobody can deny it, especially with a game like this. But if a game sells 60k copies, there is no money to grab, because just how many people will buy this DLC? 1k? There is no way this would make up for the costs of producing the DLC, so why should 3rd parties bother? They are not charities. I mean, NFS:MW sold 400k on Vita and that still wasn't enough to give us those few additional cars. And while I'd love to get these cars as I really enjoy the game and feel bad about EA for ignoring us (X360 version sold 1.14 mil and they got the DLCs...), we have to be aware that as long as our favourite platforms (PSV and Wii U) keep on struggling, we have to enjoy what we get. Sad but true.

 

Is this Injustice game any good? How does it compare to MK Vita or the Street Fighter game on Vita? If I'm not really that much into fighters, would I enjoy it? Is the platinum hard to get? ;)


So let me get this straight, It's Nintendo's fault that I have to go multiple stores to find a 3rd party game that is readily available from that same 3rd Party developer on competing platforms. Who ever you blame for Nintendo's third party woes, once a publisher decides to put a game on platform. It's there responsiblity to make sure the game is actually available for purchase. It is also that publisher's responsibility to make DLC available. You want to blame Nintendo for not getting more third party titles on their platforms? By all means, but at some point publisher has to have some modicum of responsibility. 


so whom should i blame for the wonderful 101?..

Nintendo, handily. They clearly lost faith in the title at some point in the course of this year.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

AshKetchum1992 on 08 October 2013

Odd that there is no One version...



SnakeDrake on 08 October 2013

injustice didn't caught me the same way MK did so i'll probably get MK on the vita. Though i would prefer a tekken, street fighter or king of fighters game on the vita. No F that just give me Bloody Roar!!!



 

Bet with gooch_destroyer, he wins if FFX and FFX-2 will be at $40 each for the vita. I win if it dont

Sign up if you want to see God Eater 2 get localized!! https://www.change.org/petitions/shift-inc-bring-god-eater-2-to-north-america-2#share

oniyide on 08 October 2013
Darc Requiem said:
kitler53 said:
Mr Khan said:
..

I'm not suggesting that we categorically refuse to support publishers based on what they do or do not do. If EA ever made a game that i wanted to buy (and put it on a platform i owned), i would buy it, despite being EA.

The point i'm trying to make (now with less vitriol as i've calmed down a touch) is that you can never trust these guys. Be grateful for what's there, buy it if you like it, but know that even the "good" ones (like Warner Bros, Capcom, Sega, and Ubisoft) are going to screw the Nintendo base at times and for unfathomable reasons. Fairness simply doesn't exist for us (Ports to handhelds, in your example, are another matter entirely. Handheld owners should simply expect screw-age from Western third parties in general)

or far more likely...

...nintendo console owners such as yourself simply don't want these games.


Or just as likely, Nintendo console owners are multi-console owners. In the case of Injustice and NFS:MW, both of which I own on Wii U. I had to make a concerted effort to buy both games. I had to wait a half a year for NFS, most people in my situation would have bougt the game on PC, 360, or PS3.  I own all those platforms. In the case of Injustice, I literally could have bought the PS3 or 360 version twice before I even had the opportunity to buy the Wii U version. The most discouraging part of this is that ultimately I had to work harder just to buy a DLC gimped version of each. NFS for Wii U had no DLC support and Injustice has had poor DLC support and gimped on-line play. This is why 3rd party games have such a hard time on Nintendo platforms. You literally have to work to buy games that are often inferior versions to their more readily available counterparts.


i dont mean to sound rude but IMHO this sounds like a you problem and not a 3rd party problem. Who in there right mind would actively seek out WORST versions of games for...hell i dont know. I cant think of a logical reason to do that especially when you can play the versions that get the support and arent late.



Around the Network
archer9234 on 08 October 2013
Dv8thwonder said:
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
I remember another 'Ultimate' edition of a fighting franchise coming out not to long ago and nobody cared for that either.

Thanks to that BS manuever Capcom did. I no longer buy any fighting game right away anymore. I can finally buy Injustice now.


Huh? What? Aren't you sending a clear message to 3rd party dev/publishers that this behavior is okay by actually buying it. I don't understand this logic.

I haven't bought Injsutice. Now I can. I wait for the whatever version that comes out later. I no longer support first releases of fighting games. After what Capcom did with MVC3.



Scisca on 08 October 2013
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
I remember another 'Ultimate' edition of a fighting franchise coming out not to long ago and nobody cared for that either.

Thanks to that BS manuever Capcom did. I no longer buy any fighting game right away anymore. I can finally buy Injustice now.


Huh? What? Aren't you sending a clear message to 3rd party dev/publishers that this behavior is okay by actually buying it. I don't understand this logic.

I haven't bought Injsutice. Now I can. I wait for the whatever version that comes out later. I no longer support first releases of fighting games. After what Capcom did with MVC3.


I have foung this to be the best policy with all games, not just fighting games. Why pay 60 Euro day 1, when you can wait a few month and get the game and 30-40 Euro worth of DLCs for 20 Euro? It's not like I have no backlog and have nothing to play during this time.



Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!

My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/

My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.

jonathanalis on 08 October 2013

no fighting game on ps4
in xbox it would compete with killer instinct..
so, no having games is good!



archer9234 on 08 October 2013
Scisca said:
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
I remember another 'Ultimate' edition of a fighting franchise coming out not to long ago and nobody cared for that either.

Thanks to that BS manuever Capcom did. I no longer buy any fighting game right away anymore. I can finally buy Injustice now.


Huh? What? Aren't you sending a clear message to 3rd party dev/publishers that this behavior is okay by actually buying it. I don't understand this logic.

I haven't bought Injsutice. Now I can. I wait for the whatever version that comes out later. I no longer support first releases of fighting games. After what Capcom did with MVC3.


I have foung this to be the best policy with all games, not just fighting games. Why pay 60 Euro day 1, when you can wait a few month and get the game and 30-40 Euro worth of DLCs for 20 Euro? It's not like I have no backlog and have nothing to play during this time.


Agreed. But Capcom lying about dlc and making my MVC3 collectors edtion useless was my first and last draw with them.



Scisca on 08 October 2013
archer9234 said:
Scisca said:
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
archer9234 said:
Dv8thwonder said:
I remember another 'Ultimate' edition of a fighting franchise coming out not to long ago and nobody cared for that either.

Thanks to that BS manuever Capcom did. I no longer buy any fighting game right away anymore. I can finally buy Injustice now.


Huh? What? Aren't you sending a clear message to 3rd party dev/publishers that this behavior is okay by actually buying it. I don't understand this logic.

I haven't bought Injsutice. Now I can. I wait for the whatever version that comes out later. I no longer support first releases of fighting games. After what Capcom did with MVC3.


I have foung this to be the best policy with all games, not just fighting games. Why pay 60 Euro day 1, when you can wait a few month and get the game and 30-40 Euro worth of DLCs for 20 Euro? It's not like I have no backlog and have nothing to play during this time.


Agreed. But Capcom lying about dlc and making my MVC3 collectors edtion useless was my first and last draw with them.


Well I'm boycotting crapcom either way, so I don't even know what they did to MVC3. How did they screw the gamers there?



Wii U is a GCN 2 - I called it months before the release!

My Vita to-buy list: The Walking Dead, Persona 4 Golden, Need for Speed: Most Wanted, TearAway, Ys: Memories of Celceta, Muramasa: The Demon Blade, History: Legends of War, FIFA 13, Final Fantasy HD X, X-2, Worms Revolution Extreme, The Amazing Spiderman, Batman: Arkham Origins Blackgate - too many no-gaemz :/

My consoles: PS2 Slim, PS3 Slim 320 GB, PSV 32 GB, Wii, DSi.