By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bayonetta 2 Reportedly Runs in 1080p 60fps

withdreday on 14 September 2013
MDMAlliance said:
withdreday said:
irstupid said:

The didnt' deny it, they flat out said that any ports or anything would NOT be up to them.  Nintendo owns the freaking game.  Nintendo is the only company who can make the decision to port the game.

Boy I bet you're going to be incredibly disappointed if and when this game gets ported. Like I said, it's not even this big of a deal. It's Bayonetta, not MGS5 or something. If it doesn't get ported, 99% of gamers will do just fine without it.

And the 2 people that care about the series this much will just buy a Wii U. People need to quit acting like their lives depend on this not being ported to next gen consoles. It wasn't even that much major of a franchise to begin with.

 


Well, no.  It wont get ported.  Do you really think Nintendo would allow that?  Legally it can't happen unless Nintendo lets it happen.  I don't see that happening any time in the forseeable future.  So the chance Bayonetta 2 will get ported to anything but a Nintendo console is something so astronomically low that it isn't even worth considering.  Just because it happened before with a different company doesn't mean it has a chance of happening.  

Also about your second point, it's not about how big it is.  It's about having quality exclusives.

It's not Nintendo's series just like Mass Effect wasn't Microsoft's and so on and so forth. And even if they've bought the rights to the entire series (which I've yet to have seen proof of) Sega can easily buy out of the deal and still do a port if they want.

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.



Around the Network
Zero999 on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:
MDMAlliance said:


Well, no.  It wont get ported.  Do you really think Nintendo would allow that?  Legally it can't happen unless Nintendo lets it happen.  I don't see that happening any time in the forseeable future.  So the chance Bayonetta 2 will get ported to anything but a Nintendo console is something so astronomically low that it isn't even worth considering.  Just because it happened before with a different company doesn't mean it has a chance of happening.  

Also about your second point, it's not about how big it is.  It's about having quality exclusives.

It's not Nintendo's series just like Mass Effect wasn't Microsoft's and so on and so forth. And even if they've bought the rights to the entire series (which I've yet to have seen proof of) Sega can easily buy out of the deal and still do a port if they want.

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.

BAYONETTA 2 (GAME) belongs to nintendo. BAYONETTA (IP) belongs to sega.



sc94597 on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.


http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/bayonetta

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/bayonetta

 LOL



Mr Khan on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:
MDMAlliance said:
withdreday said:
irstupid said:

The didnt' deny it, they flat out said that any ports or anything would NOT be up to them.  Nintendo owns the freaking game.  Nintendo is the only company who can make the decision to port the game.

Boy I bet you're going to be incredibly disappointed if and when this game gets ported. Like I said, it's not even this big of a deal. It's Bayonetta, not MGS5 or something. If it doesn't get ported, 99% of gamers will do just fine without it.

And the 2 people that care about the series this much will just buy a Wii U. People need to quit acting like their lives depend on this not being ported to next gen consoles. It wasn't even that much major of a franchise to begin with.

 


Well, no.  It wont get ported.  Do you really think Nintendo would allow that?  Legally it can't happen unless Nintendo lets it happen.  I don't see that happening any time in the forseeable future.  So the chance Bayonetta 2 will get ported to anything but a Nintendo console is something so astronomically low that it isn't even worth considering.  Just because it happened before with a different company doesn't mean it has a chance of happening.  

Also about your second point, it's not about how big it is.  It's about having quality exclusives.

It's not Nintendo's series just like Mass Effect wasn't Microsoft's and so on and so forth. And even if they've bought the rights to the entire series (which I've yet to have seen proof of) Sega can easily buy out of the deal and still do a port if they want.

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.

Nintendo bought the game. Just like how the 007 games aren't Nintendo's series, but Goldeneye 007 can't appear anywhere without Nintendo's permission (although due to Rare playing for Microsoft, the game now can't appear anywhere). If its true for Goldeneye, its true for Bayonetta.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

MDMAlliance on 14 September 2013
hsrob said:

Every bloody Bayonetta 2 threads devolves into this tired cyclicle debate. (It would be great if people could just talk about the game)

A: This game looks great.  Will probably get ported though, Nintendo fans don't like this kind of game.

B: This game won't get ported, Nintendo paid for it.

A: Yeah but other games have been ported after promised exclusivity.

B: Nintendo paid for the whole game from start to finish, without Nintendo there was never going to be a Bayonetta 2, Sega didn't want to make it.

A: Yeah, but it will probably get ported.

C: How? Why would Nintendo do that?

A: How do you know it won't.  Anyway it's just Bayonetta, it's not that good, it's not going to save the WiiU

B: It's effectively a Nintendo game, no one said it would, but it could still be a great game.

A: Yeah but it's going to sell like crap and.....then it'll get ported.


It probably goes like that because anybody who doesn't have a Nintendo console and knows about the game doesn't want to give Nintendo any credit for anything.  Because apparently Nintendo can't possibly secure any quality 3rd party IP's ever as exclusive.



Around the Network
burninmylight on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:
MDMAlliance said:
withdreday said:
irstupid said:

The didnt' deny it, they flat out said that any ports or anything would NOT be up to them.  Nintendo owns the freaking game.  Nintendo is the only company who can make the decision to port the game.

Boy I bet you're going to be incredibly disappointed if and when this game gets ported. Like I said, it's not even this big of a deal. It's Bayonetta, not MGS5 or something. If it doesn't get ported, 99% of gamers will do just fine without it.

And the 2 people that care about the series this much will just buy a Wii U. People need to quit acting like their lives depend on this not being ported to next gen consoles. It wasn't even that much major of a franchise to begin with.

 


Well, no.  It wont get ported.  Do you really think Nintendo would allow that?  Legally it can't happen unless Nintendo lets it happen.  I don't see that happening any time in the forseeable future.  So the chance Bayonetta 2 will get ported to anything but a Nintendo console is something so astronomically low that it isn't even worth considering.  Just because it happened before with a different company doesn't mean it has a chance of happening.  

Also about your second point, it's not about how big it is.  It's about having quality exclusives.

It's not Nintendo's series just like Mass Effect wasn't Microsoft's and so on and so forth. And even if they've bought the rights to the entire series (which I've yet to have seen proof of) Sega can easily buy out of the deal and still do a port if they want.

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.

You sure do love wasting time and energy to pointlessly argue over meaningless, run of the mill exclusives that you claim aren't a big deal, yet claim it is a huge deal in the very next post.

Rol would be proud of this level of stealth trolling.



withdreday on 14 September 2013
Zero999 said:
withdreday said:
MDMAlliance said:


Well, no.  It wont get ported.  Do you really think Nintendo would allow that?  Legally it can't happen unless Nintendo lets it happen.  I don't see that happening any time in the forseeable future.  So the chance Bayonetta 2 will get ported to anything but a Nintendo console is something so astronomically low that it isn't even worth considering.  Just because it happened before with a different company doesn't mean it has a chance of happening.  

Also about your second point, it's not about how big it is.  It's about having quality exclusives.

It's not Nintendo's series just like Mass Effect wasn't Microsoft's and so on and so forth. And even if they've bought the rights to the entire series (which I've yet to have seen proof of) Sega can easily buy out of the deal and still do a port if they want.

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.

BAYONETTA 2 (GAME) belongs to nintendo. BAYONETTA (IP) belongs to sega.

Source? I've seen nothing official saying such a thing. Don't just keep repeating the same thing without backing it up first.

That's when it becomes hard to take it seriously.





Zero999 on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:
Zero999 said:

BAYONETTA 2 (GAME) belongs to nintendo. BAYONETTA (IP) belongs to sega.

Source? I've seen nothing official saying such a thing. Don't just keep repeating the same thing without backing it up first.

That's when it becomes hard to take it seriously.



 

it doesn't get more official than "nintendo is funding the project" and platinum games saying it's nintendo's call on wich platforms the game arrives.



RazorDragon on 14 September 2013
withdreday said:

Source? I've seen nothing official saying such a thing. Don't just keep repeating the same thing without backing it up first.

That's when it becomes hard to take it seriously.



 




withdreday on 14 September 2013
sc94597 said:
withdreday said:

And yes it is about how big it is. Ninty needs system sellers, not run of the mill exclusives.


http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/bayonetta

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/bayonetta

 LOL

And? Take a look at that user score. It's not a major franchise. People are talking about this game like it's Halo or Uncharted i.e a game people buy a system just to play. It's not. It's just one of those games that's a bonus to have on the system like Splinter Cell. It's not a system seller like those other two franchise.

If this game wasn't a exclusive, no one would be talking about it, and they probably still shouldn't.

"You sure do love wasting time and energy to pointlessly argue over meaningless, run of the mill exclusives that you claim aren't a big deal, yet claim it is a huge deal in the very next post.

Rol would be proud of this level of stealth trolling."

There the ones. You'd think this game was BF4 or something.