It's funny the Nintendo crowd constantly throws out that the Vita is nothing but ports, when they more than likely don't have either the PS3 or 360 to actually play those so called ports.  If you don't own a PS360, then the "ports" argument is a moot point because you won't have access to those games regardless.

Ports apparently only count for Nintendo though.  If you're Sony and you have ports or multiconsole games, it's like commiting all seven deadly sins at once.  Nintendo though it's fine.  Zelda OoT, Rayman Legends, Super Street Fighter 4, Star Fox 64, and Cave Story.  You always see these listed as good games for the 3DS. 

It's funny the Nintendo crowd constantly throws out that the Vita is nothing but ports, when they more than likely don't have either the PS3 or 360 to actually play those so called ports.  If you don't own a PS360, then the "ports" argument is a moot point because you won't have access to those games regardless.

Ports apparently only count for Nintendo though.  If you're Sony and you have ports or multiconsole games, it's like commiting all seven deadly sins at once.  Nintendo though it's fine.  Zelda OoT, Rayman Legends, Super Street Fighter 4, Star Fox 64, and Cave Story.  You always see these listed as good games for the 3DS. 

Your first paragraph is logically consistent from a Nintendo fan's point of view. If someone doesn't own a PS3 or 360 to play those multiplatform games that aren't available on Nintendo systems, then that means those games aren't interesting to them regardless of the platform they are on. Ergo, the Vita's lineup lacks appeal.

From the point of view of people who are interested in those multiplatform games, they can play them on other platforms which they are very likely to own. Ergo, the Vita's lineup lacks appeal.

Atleast until those exact same franchises become Nintendo exclusive, then Nintendo fans praise them like they're the best games in the world.

Ports of old games: if I was interested in one of those games I likely already bought them, if not probably I didn´t really have any interest in the first place, thank god I´m not desperate enough to buy mediocre games to justify a system I´ve bought and a patient person that I actually can wait for new software.

ports of PS3 games("simultanous release"): mostly downgraded on PSV, so I don´t really see a reason to choose the inferior version of the game

ports of smartphone games: no thank you

The biggest problem right now is that Sony is pushing extremely hard the the latter/old smartphone indy games category, something I just don´t care about. It´s a nice bonus for the ones who care, but personally I bought the system more for games like Wipeout2047. So please PSV lovers have mercy.

If you purchased a handheld console to play it from home, then you kinda missed the point. And if you purchased it to actually carry it with yourself, then buying "mostly downgraded ports" has it's appeal. Unless of course you take with yourself wherever you go your homeconsoles, TV, games...

If you bought your system for Wipeout, a person would expect that you at least know the name of the game... It's 2048...

Which would still be levelheaded, because exclusives are exclusive.

Your first paragraph is logically consistent from a Nintendo fan's point of view. If someone doesn't own a PS3 or 360 to play those multiplatform games that aren't available on Nintendo systems, then that means those games aren't interesting to them regardless of the platform they are on. Ergo, the Vita's lineup lacks appeal.

From the point of view of people who are interested in those multiplatform games, they can play them on other platforms which they are very likely to own. Ergo, the Vita's lineup lacks appeal.