Apologies, my good sir. It appears I may have made some rash assumptions when I began discussing this with you.

I tend to assume that, when having a discussion with someone on the internet, they meet the minimum requirements of bodily function and have at least basic reading comprehension. If that's not the case, I'll gladly indulge you and point out your fallacy once again. I bolded it above, since you missed it. It is one I see you have repeated multiple times and it is the premise of my comment that spawned this entire tangent.

"Forum Experts already debunked it."

People with technical expertise have explained to you in no uncertain terms that this rumor has no merit.

You see, no one on this thread has done what you keep claiming. Also, the fact that you assume they have high credentials is laughable. While a very very select few (myself included) may have higher than average computer hardware credentials, the majority of thread posters contributing to your claims were not technically advanced and did not offer any credible support for or against the rumors. I assure you I am far from a layman when it comes to these topics, but I assume you are a layman (I believe you even admitted such, yourself), given that you do not ever offer arguments yourself, you simply claim that the arguments of others have already done the work. In hind-sight, I can see why you keep making this false assumption now, since you are a self-proclaimed layman in terms of advanced computer technology.

There have been some posters in this thread that have provided evidence to support the rumor in some regard, and some posters have provided evidence against. I don't think anyone in this thread expects the rumor to have any chance of being accurate, verbatim, as that would be crazy. No one on this thread has been able to adequately confirm or deny the rumor outright. This is what you keep missing, and thus yields your fallacy that "it has no merit or has already been debunked."

If you truly believe in your claim, please feel free to provide any cogent evidence of it. As currently all we have are your unfounded claims and an appearance of a falsely attributed superiority complex bordering on the hyperbolically asinine.

It's pretty clear you didn't actually read the thread as nearly every single person who has any credibility on this site on hardware topics shot this rumor down. 

But hey, enjoy those clouds.

It was never believable! Just desperate people trying to clutch at straws. Common sense went out of the window. Ethomaz and DrKohler explained in great detail why it was impossible many times. The 2nd clue was how come ne respecatble tech site ever gave this rumour any credence

A couple of observations:

• Not many people actually paid credence to this rumour, but were discussing the possibility
• This was accompanied by a ton of posts shouting this discussion down
• Your account only seems to post when ethomaz is banned

I remember quite a few posters here mentioning the secret holy grail NDA as the reason why MS or AMD couldn't mention the secret sauce DGPU. There was no NDA but alot of people were willing to believe in it and defend it to the hilt just like the DGPU. There was never any chance of the DGPU as it was impossible with the current tech and a waste of time as a more powerful GPU like the 8970 would be cheaper than a 2 GPU solution. Also imagine coding for that solution?

I'm from the UK. Ethomaz isn't from the UK

Actually just saying "No it cannot be true" isn't really debunking anything.  In any debate, you have to present your side of an Opinion voice with experience and information to support it.  Most people debunking just said "Nope can't happen" which is very weak argument.