By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - IGN : The Wonderful 101 Review

Hynad on 18 August 2013
curl-6 said:
Hynad said:

I doubt you would have complained about it if he had used the same sentence structure to praise it instead.

Not gonna lie, I respond more positively to people assuming I'm skillful than people assuming I suck at something.

Already called your behaviour here.



Around the Network
curl-6 on 18 August 2013
Hynad said:
curl-6 said:
Hynad said:

I doubt you would have complained about it if he had used the same sentence structure to praise it instead.

Not gonna lie, I respond more positively to people assuming I'm skillful than people assuming I suck at something.

Already called your behaviour here.

No, you didn't. That doesn't apply to me. You said "your lot gives a 9-10 score to those games before they're even out."

Wonderful 101 has looked like a 7/10 game to me from the start, so I actually think less of it than the IGN reviewer.



cheesecake on 18 August 2013
tbone51 said:

IGN

Idiots
Gone
Nuts :0

 

edit: that was pretty damn corny o.O

you can't spell Ignorant without IGN!



Mythmaker1 on 18 August 2013
curl-6 said:

No, you didn't. That doesn't apply to me. You said "your lot gives a 9-10 score to those games before they're even out."

Wonderful 101 has looked like a 7/10 game to me from the start, so I actually think less of it than the IGN reviewer.

Would you consider 7/10 to be very high quality?



I believe in honesty, civility, generosity, practicality, and impartiality.

Hynad on 18 August 2013
curl-6 said:
Hynad said:
curl-6 said:
Hynad said:

I doubt you would have complained about it if he had used the same sentence structure to praise it instead.

Not gonna lie, I respond more positively to people assuming I'm skillful than people assuming I suck at something.

Already called your behaviour here.

No, you didn't. That doesn't apply to me. You said "your lot gives a 9-10 score to those games before they're even out."

Wonderful 101 has looked like a 7/10 game to me from the start, so I actually think less of it than the IGN reviewer.

No, but the part where finding excuses to condemn the writer for his opinion being different to yours (you gave the game a 9, compared to Gamespot's 7.5)... That one applies.



Around the Network
brute on 18 August 2013
cheesecake said:
tbone51 said:

IGN

Idiots
Gone
Nuts :0

 

edit: that was pretty damn corny o.O

you can't spell Ignorant with IGN!

I think you mean without IGN .



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

curl-6 on 18 August 2013
Hynad said:
curl-6 said:
Hynad said:

Already called your behaviour here.

No, you didn't. That doesn't apply to me. You said "your lot gives a 9-10 score to those games before they're even out."

Wonderful 101 has looked like a 7/10 game to me from the start, so I actually think less of it than the IGN reviewer.

No, but the part where finding excuses to condemn the writer for his opinion being different to yours (you gave the game a 9, compared to Gamespot's 7.5)... That one applies.

I didn't comdemn his opinion. It's perfectly legitimate. He does seem to suck at the game, but that doesn't disqualify his opinion. It just makes his opinion less applicable to me.

I even said: "Still, a review is just a glorified opinion, so they're within their rights to suck at the game."



Hynad on 18 August 2013
curl-6 said:
Hynad said:
curl-6 said:

No, you didn't. That doesn't apply to me. You said "your lot gives a 9-10 score to those games before they're even out."

Wonderful 101 has looked like a 7/10 game to me from the start, so I actually think less of it than the IGN reviewer.

No, but the part where finding excuses to condemn the writer for his opinion being different to yours (you gave the game a 9, compared to Gamespot's 7.5)... That one applies.

I didn't comdemn his opinion. It's perfectly legitimate. He does seem to suck at the game, but that doesn't disqualify his opinion. It just makes his opinion less applicable to me.

I even said: "Still, a review is just a glorified opinion, so they're within their rights to suck at the game."

They don't have the same opinion as me = they suck. Thanks for the heads up.



curl-6 on 18 August 2013
Hynad said:

They don't have the same opinion as me = they suck. Thanks for the heads up.

No, when someone demonstrates a poor ability to operate a game, they suck at it.



curl-6 on 18 August 2013
Mythmaker1 said:
curl-6 said:

No, you didn't. That doesn't apply to me. You said "your lot gives a 9-10 score to those games before they're even out."

Wonderful 101 has looked like a 7/10 game to me from the start, so I actually think less of it than the IGN reviewer.

Would you consider 7/10 to be very high quality?

Above average, but not great.