By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 58: Avatar The Last Airbender

Nachomamma8 on 05 August 2013
Yoshiya said:
spurgeonryan said:
I think we need to look at who really knows this show. Who can manipulate the characters to their benefit. Then jump on them early on.

Why would we need to do that? If Mario has done this game properly there should be no way to manipulate the characters since their rules etc. won't be linked to their character.

In fact, I'm so confident of that I'm going to name claim now: Toph Beifong (a blind earthbender of exceptional skill)

I liked this claim. I also liked spurge's crazy suggestion, but less than I liked this nameclaim.

benao87 said:
Well, I think spurge point is interesting. I haven't seen the series, and I would assume that a person that keeps hanging to flavour would likely try to confuse people that have not seen it, like spurge, trashleg or myself. 

Anyways, spurge being crazy is a good tell. Nothing out of the ordinary around.

Benao I <3 you and completely agree with this statement.

Drinkzmax and his weak suspicion on Stefl is not something that I enjoyed very much.

AstroGamer said:
Vote:Time limit
I feel nothing going get done if we don't get Day 1 over soon. Though we are still waiting for Nacho and Bette to check in. We aren't going to get any decisive evidence unless day 1 ends

This post is seriously, seriously town although I think adding a time limit early is horrible and always makes me cry.

Yoshiya said:
I'm also inclined to believe Vette. Whilst Miller is rare,claiming it before everyone has even shown up (meaning Nacho could potentially be Miller himself) seems too risky for a mafia team.

Yeah, he's town.

 

Drunk me liked a Linkz vote because his contributions were seriously lacking. Sober me agrees with that assessment completely. 



Around the Network
Nachomamma8 on 05 August 2013

Yoshiya, Astro, Vetterman are good town reads.

Stefl sort of feels off if what Spurge says is true, but I'm letting that one ferment for a little while.



Vetteman94 on 05 August 2013

Personally I don't care about anyone's name claim, basically because I don't believe that alignments match. So I think anyone who is so open to name claim to prove their innocence is suspicious. Especially ones who know about the story/world of Avatar: TLA



Yoshiya on 05 August 2013
Vetteman94 said:
Personally I don't care about anyone's name claim, basically because I don't believe that alignments match. So I think anyone who is so open to name claim to prove their innocence is suspicious. Especially ones who know about the story/world of Avatar: TLA

Hence my name claim. I was doing it to prove that people can't use the flavour to their advantage (if they could, I'd instantly be freed as one of the mafia being an EARTH bender who is blind, not exactly the kind of person that can burn flying lemurs. If it was as simple as that to work out who was mafia though, this game would be easily finished after a mass nameclaim and then the people who know the flavour can sort out who is good and bad (that and anyone who was inclined to look up the flavour on the Avatar Wiki)



Vetteman94 on 05 August 2013
Yoshiya said:
Vetteman94 said:
Personally I don't care about anyone's name claim, basically because I don't believe that alignments match. So I think anyone who is so open to name claim to prove their innocence is suspicious. Especially ones who know about the story/world of Avatar: TLA

Hence my name claim. I was doing it to prove that people can't use the flavour to their advantage (if they could, I'd instantly be freed as one of the mafia being an EARTH bender who is blind, not exactly the kind of person that can burn flying lemurs. If it was as simple as that to work out who was mafia though, this game would be easily finished after a mass nameclaim and then the people who know the flavour can sort out who is good and bad (that and anyone who was inclined to look up the flavour on the Avatar Wiki)

Then why nameclaim if it proves nothing?    Thats what i don't understand.



Around the Network
Stefl1504 on 05 August 2013
Nachomamma8 said:
Yoshiya, Astro, Vetterman are good town reads.

Stefl sort of feels off if what Spurge says is true, but I'm letting that one ferment for a little while.

That is why spurge has to be lynched, he is rambling random shit and always gets away with it. It makes me sour.

Also, Vette is a liar, not that I am a miller, but in my eyes, he is clearly a liar.



Currently Streaming: Tales of Xillia & Best Doto - My DotA 2 stats

Stefl1504 on 05 August 2013
Vetteman94 said:
Yoshiya said:
Vetteman94 said:
Personally I don't care about anyone's name claim, basically because I don't believe that alignments match. So I think anyone who is so open to name claim to prove their innocence is suspicious. Especially ones who know about the story/world of Avatar: TLA

Hence my name claim. I was doing it to prove that people can't use the flavour to their advantage (if they could, I'd instantly be freed as one of the mafia being an EARTH bender who is blind, not exactly the kind of person that can burn flying lemurs. If it was as simple as that to work out who was mafia though, this game would be easily finished after a mass nameclaim and then the people who know the flavour can sort out who is good and bad (that and anyone who was inclined to look up the flavour on the Avatar Wiki)

Then why nameclaim if it proves nothing?    Thats what i don't understand.

He claimed to prove that it proves nothing, ergo he is scum.



Currently Streaming: Tales of Xillia & Best Doto - My DotA 2 stats

Vetteman94 on 05 August 2013
Stefl1504 said:
Nachomamma8 said:
Yoshiya, Astro, Vetterman are good town reads.

Stefl sort of feels off if what Spurge says is true, but I'm letting that one ferment for a little while.

That is why spurge has to be lynched, he is rambling random shit and always gets away with it. It makes me sour.

Also, Vette is a liar, not that I am a miller, but in my eyes, he is clearly a liar.


I dont know why I am bothering to respond to this.

But how am I a liar?  



Yoshiya on 05 August 2013
Vetteman94 said:

Then why nameclaim if it proves nothing?    Thats what i don't understand.

To prove a point to Spurge. He was making it out that nameclaiming would let mafia control town, I wanted to show Spurge that even after nameclaiming, I wouldn't be manipulated by scum (ofc there is the chance that I am scum which I'm happy people aren't ignoring, shows that people aren't letting flavour decide things)



Vetteman94 on 05 August 2013
Stefl1504 said:
Vetteman94 said:
Yoshiya said:
Vetteman94 said:
Personally I don't care about anyone's name claim, basically because I don't believe that alignments match. So I think anyone who is so open to name claim to prove their innocence is suspicious. Especially ones who know about the story/world of Avatar: TLA

Hence my name claim. I was doing it to prove that people can't use the flavour to their advantage (if they could, I'd instantly be freed as one of the mafia being an EARTH bender who is blind, not exactly the kind of person that can burn flying lemurs. If it was as simple as that to work out who was mafia though, this game would be easily finished after a mass nameclaim and then the people who know the flavour can sort out who is good and bad (that and anyone who was inclined to look up the flavour on the Avatar Wiki)

Then why nameclaim if it proves nothing?    Thats what i don't understand.

He claimed to prove that it proves nothing, ergo he is scum.

But you called me a liar, so how could you go along with what I say on this?