When translating comics to movies you have to adept the source material, which they did in places of MoS - but they failed in other places. They adapted the origins of Superman, and the destruction of Krypton, but they neglected to adept all the fighting. And that's one of my points; they failed to adapt certain crucial points of the story in the transition to a more realistic take of Superman. And you're right about the Avengers Universe being far more cartoony - but they're consistently so. They've managed to build something realistic withing the parameters of their universe, and that's why those movies work so well. As has TDK trilogy; those movies were very consistent, whereas MoS weren't. They tried to go for a more realistic approach but mixed it up with cartoonish violence. That's a pretty bad mix.

And you bring up another worrying point; will this Batman be from TDK Universe? Because that universe does NOT mix well with the one established in MoS. Realism vs Realistic Cartoons sort of... So they either have to come up with a brand new Batman, ignoring the WHOLE of TDK, and that means a new back ground story and introduction, which means it'll be more of a Batman movie than anything else... All I see is impending failure.

But Man of Steel story is by Christopher Nolan & David S. Goyer, and Producer was also Nolan.

This movie will have different writers & producer most likely. Without C. Nolan as a writer, you can bet it will be in good hands. I trust David S. Goyer (middle-eastern American writer)

But Man of Steel story is by Christopher Nolan & David S. Goyer, and Producer was also Nolan.

This movie will have different writers & producer most likely. Without C. Nolan as a writer, you can bet it will be in good hands. I trust David S. Goyer (middle-eastern American writer)

Yeah, on paper this looks like a steller team up, but I think the problem lies with Zack. 300 wasn't all that good; it was all about the visuals and the special effects - as was Man of Steel. The movie had some good ideas, but none was explored all that much. What bugged me was Supermans ignorance of human lives. He just didn't care. and the fact that Lois Lane figured out whom Superman was and ran around calling out "Clark! Clark!" all the time really got to me. No way Superman would destroy a city like he did in the Fight with Zod, nor would he let a city get demolished as it did by the cryptonians. THAT'S what made this a bad superman flick. Cool super hero movie and cool special effects, but it had nothing to do with superman.

300 doesn't have much material, like Fantastic Four.
Superman just became superman, so I don't know how skill he is suppose to be,malus he thinks of himself as pretty weak for a super strong person, but he clearly doesn't realize just how strong he really is.

Plus it was still more better then Star Trek 1 & Dragonball Evolution 1 LOL.

John Hamm needs to be Batman.

That is Bruce Wayne if I have ever seen him.