I would have agreed to this about 6 months ago but MS has really improved their deals (probably because of PS+) and now I regularly see pretty good deals on the 360 every week

I am not fanboy at all, sony offered me 50-60 games for rent during a year for 50 dollars, I thought it is a good deal and bought Plus. Now I have 60 rented games for years and years, after 2 years I will have played 130+ games for 100 dollars. It is a rent, but a payed 0,70U$D to rent each game, FOR TWO YEARS.

Go to a blockbuster and propose that: Hey dude, how about you rent me LittleBigPlanet 2 for 2 YEARS for 70 cents?

The dude will kick you out of the store.

Do you really think this is a bad deal?

I mean, as a rent, as a bunch of games you can play...

PSN Plus is a service, and as a service I think it is a very good one. Also, they give CRAZY DISCOUNTS, like, I have paid 1 or 2 dollars for 15 dollars games. these ones I can keep forever. And, as a good service, like Netflix, for instance, I intend to keep using it.

Xbox live was a great online service for consoles before psn+ started. Now psn+ is the king of console online service. The value of psn+ is tremendous.

Wow, that's a really weak argument.  For the family share plan (if it even worked like some believed), 10 people could share the same game.  The devs saw no extra money from that.  Of course, Sony had a similar setup, but only with 5 people.  What happened?  Devs demanded it be lowered.  If you don't think they same thing would have happened with family share, you're dreaming.

As for PS Plus, do you honestly think Sony is just stealing the dev's game code and giving them to Plus members?  Lol, if you do.  No, Sony is giving them a piece of the pie.  They either give them money based on how many times their games are downloaded or, and this is how I think it's done, they give each dev/publisher a certain amount of every subscriber's payment.  So, say a dev says it's cool to put their game on Plus, Sony probably gives them ~$.25 for every member of Plus.  And they probably also give like ~$.05 for every game that receives a Plus discount.  This means that Sony keeps about half of the money from the sub fee (or ~$25M for every 1M Plus subscribers), while a dev can get ~$250K for every 1M Plus subscribers if they offer their game for free, and ~$50K if they offer there game at a discount.  So, it's a win for Sony, the dev/publisher, and the gamer.

No but the games they will offer will be free forever! 

I can play this game 100 years in the future, good luck with your psn games after you stop paying. 

"Free" games as long as you keep paying!

LMAO @ the thought of MS hardware lasting 100 years...

That's a really great service. I'm surprised MS has done nothing to try to compete with this service for so long.
Also, I don't understand this argument of owning or renting games. For me, once I've played the game, I won't play it again so renting the game doesn't make a difference.

It is a counter to me. I don't see a reason to switch to PS3.

I never argued that XBL is better for everybody. But to me it is...

I like to collect games. I never sell my games, because I only buy what I really like and enjoy playing countless of hours.

No piece of hardware can last that long